Add to ORKG<p>The authors regret for the below correction missed: Correction: On pages 68, there are three wrong equations. The corrected equations are: On page 68, left column, 4th line from below, there is a wrong dimension. The corrected dimension is: Ha (kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>) On page 69, Table 1, there is a wrong parameter value. The corrected value is: Ha for Γ<sup>*</sup> = 38,830 The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.</p
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The Tables 1 and 2 were publ...
Following publication of our article [1], the authors noticed that the data incorporated into Figure...
In the original publication of the article, the data in Table 6 ‘‘Comparison of the different search...
In the June 2016 issue (48:1, page 56), the Editorial Staff inadvertently omitted corrections provid...
Reference [6]: “Phys. Lett. B 763, 280” should have been corrected into “Phys. Lett. B 763, 280 (201...
There is an error in Table 1 of the correction. The publisher apologizes for the error. Please see t...
The publisher regrets to notify an error in the abovementioned publication. Specifically, a wrong ve...
The original PDF version of this Article contained an error in Table 1. On the right-hand side of th...
The authors regret an error in the Fig. 2(d) caption. The text "U=1.3 V" in the published version sh...
The publisher regrets that due to a conversion problem there were mistakes in this article. [13C12C2...
The publisher apologises that upon publication of this article a typographical error was introduced ...
The authors regret that Fig. 2 and 3 are incorrect. The correct figures are as follows: (Figure Pres...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The Tables 1 and 2 were publ...
This is an erratum to the paper 'The Zeldovich approximation and wide-angle redshift-space distortio...
This is an erratum to the paper ‘Testing gravity with wide binary stars like α Centauri’, published ...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The Tables 1 and 2 were publ...
Following publication of our article [1], the authors noticed that the data incorporated into Figure...
In the original publication of the article, the data in Table 6 ‘‘Comparison of the different search...
In the June 2016 issue (48:1, page 56), the Editorial Staff inadvertently omitted corrections provid...
Reference [6]: “Phys. Lett. B 763, 280” should have been corrected into “Phys. Lett. B 763, 280 (201...
There is an error in Table 1 of the correction. The publisher apologizes for the error. Please see t...
The publisher regrets to notify an error in the abovementioned publication. Specifically, a wrong ve...
The original PDF version of this Article contained an error in Table 1. On the right-hand side of th...
The authors regret an error in the Fig. 2(d) caption. The text "U=1.3 V" in the published version sh...
The publisher regrets that due to a conversion problem there were mistakes in this article. [13C12C2...
The publisher apologises that upon publication of this article a typographical error was introduced ...
The authors regret that Fig. 2 and 3 are incorrect. The correct figures are as follows: (Figure Pres...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The Tables 1 and 2 were publ...
This is an erratum to the paper 'The Zeldovich approximation and wide-angle redshift-space distortio...
This is an erratum to the paper ‘Testing gravity with wide binary stars like α Centauri’, published ...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The Tables 1 and 2 were publ...
Following publication of our article [1], the authors noticed that the data incorporated into Figure...
In the original publication of the article, the data in Table 6 ‘‘Comparison of the different search...