The decision of the High Court of New Zealand in the case of Pisaina Leilua-Lei Sam v The Council for the Ongoing Government of Tokelau and Faipule Foua Toloa (Sam v COG) provides an opportunity to consider the court system of Tokelau and to glimpse a largely unknown area of the law of New Zealand. It appears that Sam v COG is the first case to be decided by the High Court of New Zealand in the exercise of its jurisdiction as a separate Court of justice for Tokelau. This case note deals in turn with the structure of Tokelau's court system, the judgment in Sam v COG, and the future of the system
Chief Justice Michael Dishington Scott signed a court order in the Supreme Court of Tonga on Decembe...
This article discusses the Omahu affair, a prominent legal drama that took place in the late 19th ce...
This paper is for filing in the Waitangi Tribunal in relation to a claim that existing laws do not a...
The Supreme Court Act came into force 1 January 2004. It would be fair to describe the reactions to ...
This thesis was an investigation into the consequences of the Supreme Court Act 2003. The main purpo...
Professor Margaret Wilson, Professor of Law and Public Policy, Te Piringa - Faculty of Law, Universi...
This paper focuses on the period prior to the Treaty of Waitangi when the Supreme Court of New South...
The Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 constitutes the Waitangi Tribunal comprised of the Chief Judge of th...
The New Zealand Supreme Court’s decision in Wi Parata v Bishop of Wellington[1] was nothing less tha...
Some of the historic and contemporary statutory and case law examples of a hybrid Maori-British comm...
This article revisits Pacific Courts' treatment of two procedural tools for locating litigation in t...
Australia and New Zealand concluded the Agreement on Trans-Tasman Court Proceedings and Regulatory E...
x, 332 leaves ; 30 cm. Includes bibliographical references. University of Otago department: Politica...
The landmark New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in New Zealand Maori Council v AttorneyGeneral [19...
I want to discuss the very recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Torstar case. The N...
Chief Justice Michael Dishington Scott signed a court order in the Supreme Court of Tonga on Decembe...
This article discusses the Omahu affair, a prominent legal drama that took place in the late 19th ce...
This paper is for filing in the Waitangi Tribunal in relation to a claim that existing laws do not a...
The Supreme Court Act came into force 1 January 2004. It would be fair to describe the reactions to ...
This thesis was an investigation into the consequences of the Supreme Court Act 2003. The main purpo...
Professor Margaret Wilson, Professor of Law and Public Policy, Te Piringa - Faculty of Law, Universi...
This paper focuses on the period prior to the Treaty of Waitangi when the Supreme Court of New South...
The Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 constitutes the Waitangi Tribunal comprised of the Chief Judge of th...
The New Zealand Supreme Court’s decision in Wi Parata v Bishop of Wellington[1] was nothing less tha...
Some of the historic and contemporary statutory and case law examples of a hybrid Maori-British comm...
This article revisits Pacific Courts' treatment of two procedural tools for locating litigation in t...
Australia and New Zealand concluded the Agreement on Trans-Tasman Court Proceedings and Regulatory E...
x, 332 leaves ; 30 cm. Includes bibliographical references. University of Otago department: Politica...
The landmark New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in New Zealand Maori Council v AttorneyGeneral [19...
I want to discuss the very recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Torstar case. The N...
Chief Justice Michael Dishington Scott signed a court order in the Supreme Court of Tonga on Decembe...
This article discusses the Omahu affair, a prominent legal drama that took place in the late 19th ce...
This paper is for filing in the Waitangi Tribunal in relation to a claim that existing laws do not a...