Purpose of Review The ISCHEMIA trial demonstrated no difference in myocardial infarction or death in patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or large ischemia territory treated either with invasive revascularization or optimal medical therapy. Whether the findings of the randomized control trial relates to real-world outcomes is uncertain. Recent Findings Contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy has had a significant impact on the prognosis of coronary artery disease. Various observational data appear to indicate limited generalizability of the ISCHEMIA trial in different populations. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the optimal modality of therapy in patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe is...
AbstractObjectives. The Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study was initiated to determine ...
Purpose of Review: This article reviews the evidence on optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus coronar...
BACKGROUND In the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial, the primary analysis showed no significant difference in the r...
Purpose of Review The ISCHEMIA trial demonstrated no difference in myocardial infarction or death in...
To the Editor, We have read with great interest the results of the ISCHEMIA trial1 of 5179 patients ...
A healthy lifestyle, myocardial revascularisation and medical therapy constitute the three pillars f...
ABSTRACT The primary endpoint of the ISCHEMIA trial, whose results were presented at the American He...
Do Clinical Trials In Ischemic Heart Disease Meet the Needs of Those With Ischemia
During the past decade, the treatment of choice for chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) has been a cont...
Approaches to stable coronary artery disease (CАD) treatment have been subject to debate for a long ...
Although myocardial revascularization is one of the most studied types of medical interventions, the...
There is a preponderance of evidence that, in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome, an invasive...
AbstractAll patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) should be managed with guideline-dire...
This review describes the results of randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing the outcomes o...
Randomized trials have challenged the role of revascularization in stable coronary artery disease. W...
AbstractObjectives. The Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study was initiated to determine ...
Purpose of Review: This article reviews the evidence on optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus coronar...
BACKGROUND In the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial, the primary analysis showed no significant difference in the r...
Purpose of Review The ISCHEMIA trial demonstrated no difference in myocardial infarction or death in...
To the Editor, We have read with great interest the results of the ISCHEMIA trial1 of 5179 patients ...
A healthy lifestyle, myocardial revascularisation and medical therapy constitute the three pillars f...
ABSTRACT The primary endpoint of the ISCHEMIA trial, whose results were presented at the American He...
Do Clinical Trials In Ischemic Heart Disease Meet the Needs of Those With Ischemia
During the past decade, the treatment of choice for chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) has been a cont...
Approaches to stable coronary artery disease (CАD) treatment have been subject to debate for a long ...
Although myocardial revascularization is one of the most studied types of medical interventions, the...
There is a preponderance of evidence that, in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome, an invasive...
AbstractAll patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) should be managed with guideline-dire...
This review describes the results of randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing the outcomes o...
Randomized trials have challenged the role of revascularization in stable coronary artery disease. W...
AbstractObjectives. The Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study was initiated to determine ...
Purpose of Review: This article reviews the evidence on optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus coronar...
BACKGROUND In the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial, the primary analysis showed no significant difference in the r...