We argue that Congress should remake the United States Supreme Court in the U.S. courts' of appeals image by increasing the size of the Court's membership, authorizing panel decision making, and retaining an en banc procedure for select cases. In so doing, Congress would expand the Court's capacity to decide cases, facilitating enhanced clarity and consistency in the law as well as heightened monitoring of lower courts and the other branches. Remaking the Court in this way would not only expand the Court's decision making capacity but also improve the Court's composition, competence, and functioning
https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8754/thumbnail.jp
The U.S. Supreme Court revolutionized the law on pleading by its suggestive Bell Atlantic Corp. v....
https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8915/thumbnail.jp
We argue that Congress should remake the United States Supreme Court in the U.S. courts\u27 of appea...
We argue that Congress should remake the United States Supreme Court in the U.S. courts\u27 of appea...
The scope of appellate jurisdiction after final judgment has long been relatively clear. The scope o...
Two seemingly irreconcilable story arcs have emerged from the Supreme Court over the past decade. Fi...
Article IV imposes prohibitions on interstate discrimination that are central to our status as a sin...
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) and (d), as well as Supreme Court precedent, remand orders in removed case...
The legitimacy of the United States Supreme Court has been consistently attacked and undermined by t...
While the language of crisis has diminished, the caseload volume problem continues to bedevil the fe...
The Supreme Court has increasingly adopted the practice of categorically and prospectively barring i...
This Article is the first to comprehensively interrogate the impact of the Supreme Court’s recent in...
Petitioner asks this Court to interpret Fed. R. Evid. 606(b) as permitting statements made by jurors...
Recently the United States Supreme Court has ruled, in a series of cases beginning with Ornelas v. U...
https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8754/thumbnail.jp
The U.S. Supreme Court revolutionized the law on pleading by its suggestive Bell Atlantic Corp. v....
https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8915/thumbnail.jp
We argue that Congress should remake the United States Supreme Court in the U.S. courts\u27 of appea...
We argue that Congress should remake the United States Supreme Court in the U.S. courts\u27 of appea...
The scope of appellate jurisdiction after final judgment has long been relatively clear. The scope o...
Two seemingly irreconcilable story arcs have emerged from the Supreme Court over the past decade. Fi...
Article IV imposes prohibitions on interstate discrimination that are central to our status as a sin...
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) and (d), as well as Supreme Court precedent, remand orders in removed case...
The legitimacy of the United States Supreme Court has been consistently attacked and undermined by t...
While the language of crisis has diminished, the caseload volume problem continues to bedevil the fe...
The Supreme Court has increasingly adopted the practice of categorically and prospectively barring i...
This Article is the first to comprehensively interrogate the impact of the Supreme Court’s recent in...
Petitioner asks this Court to interpret Fed. R. Evid. 606(b) as permitting statements made by jurors...
Recently the United States Supreme Court has ruled, in a series of cases beginning with Ornelas v. U...
https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8754/thumbnail.jp
The U.S. Supreme Court revolutionized the law on pleading by its suggestive Bell Atlantic Corp. v....
https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8915/thumbnail.jp