Add to ORKGIn the classical framework of Indian philosophy, the different schools of thought agree on the fact that the correctness of an inference relies on a special necessary relation standing between the evidence-property and the target-property. The aim of this paper is to give a presentation of these discrepancies between the Jain and the Buddhist theories of inference, as they are found in Māṇikyanandi’s Parīkṣāmukham, the Introduction to Philosophical Investigation, a digest of Akalaṅka’s mature philosophy on one side, and in Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇavārttikasvavṛtti, his Auto-commentary on the Essay on Knowledge on the other side
By Indian logic here is meant the logic of the old Naiyāyika school, which is represented by scholar...
In classical India, debates over rational theology naturally become the occasion for fundamental que...
Logical Criticism of Buddhist Doctrines is a ‘thematic compilation’ by Avi Sion. It collects in one ...
In the classical framework of Indian philosophy, the different schools of thought agree on the fact ...
In the classical framework of Indian philosophy, the different schools of thought agree on the fact ...
The characterization of truth-preserving arguments is a core issue in India and received the detaile...
A rational interpretation is proposed for two ancient Indian logics: the Jaina saptabhaṅgī, and the ...
The practice of rational debate between philosophers from different traditions, especially between H...
The article identifies two senses of the theory of controversy developed in the traditional Indian c...
Indian philosophers have been too much preoccupied with their theories of inference. As a result, th...
In this paper, I argue that Svetambaras fail to persuade the Digambaras because they rely on opposit...
Buddhist philosophers have investigated the techniques and methodologies of debate and argumentation...
The main aim of this article is to trace the history of the concept of 'logical connec-ion' in India...
Interest in Indian religion and comparative philosophy has increased in recent years, but despite th...
Logic in Buddhist Philosophy concerns the systematic study of anumāna (often translated as inference...
By Indian logic here is meant the logic of the old Naiyāyika school, which is represented by scholar...
In classical India, debates over rational theology naturally become the occasion for fundamental que...
Logical Criticism of Buddhist Doctrines is a ‘thematic compilation’ by Avi Sion. It collects in one ...
In the classical framework of Indian philosophy, the different schools of thought agree on the fact ...
In the classical framework of Indian philosophy, the different schools of thought agree on the fact ...
The characterization of truth-preserving arguments is a core issue in India and received the detaile...
A rational interpretation is proposed for two ancient Indian logics: the Jaina saptabhaṅgī, and the ...
The practice of rational debate between philosophers from different traditions, especially between H...
The article identifies two senses of the theory of controversy developed in the traditional Indian c...
Indian philosophers have been too much preoccupied with their theories of inference. As a result, th...
In this paper, I argue that Svetambaras fail to persuade the Digambaras because they rely on opposit...
Buddhist philosophers have investigated the techniques and methodologies of debate and argumentation...
The main aim of this article is to trace the history of the concept of 'logical connec-ion' in India...
Interest in Indian religion and comparative philosophy has increased in recent years, but despite th...
Logic in Buddhist Philosophy concerns the systematic study of anumāna (often translated as inference...
By Indian logic here is meant the logic of the old Naiyāyika school, which is represented by scholar...
In classical India, debates over rational theology naturally become the occasion for fundamental que...
Logical Criticism of Buddhist Doctrines is a ‘thematic compilation’ by Avi Sion. It collects in one ...