Investigative journalism sometimes operates at the limits of the law. This is especially true of what could be called ‘check it out’ journalism: reporting in which a journalist tests how effective a law or procedure is by attempting to circumvent it. A recent decision shows that those who commit (minor) offences during this type of newsgathering activity cannot count on (major) support from the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
A recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) reflects once more the importance of...
After proceedings at national level during eight years, and after a preliminary ruling by the EU Cou...
The present article analyzes a relatively unusual case, in which a quasi-investigative journalist,...
Investigative journalism sometimes operates at the limits of the law. This is especially true of wha...
A recent decision of the European Court shows that journalists who commit (minor) offences during ne...
A recent decision of the European Court shows that journalists who commit (minor) offences during ne...
A recent decision by the ECtHR confirms that journalists who are found guilty of a criminal offence ...
In a judgment of 29 March 2016, the Grand Chamber in Bédat v. Switzerland found that a criminal conv...
Short analysis of judgment in case Pentikäinen v. Finland, arrest and criminal prosecution of journa...
The legality and acceptability of some controversial practices by journalists was at the heart of a ...
This article explores an ECJ decision involving a question of first impression, the meaning of journ...
Analysis on judgment ECtHR on defamation and freedom of expression, conflicting right
The European Court’s Second Section found that criminal proceedings against the owner and the editor...
The European Court has once more confirmed the strong protection that is to be given to journalists’...
In a case against Iceland the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) stated that a journalist respon...
A recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) reflects once more the importance of...
After proceedings at national level during eight years, and after a preliminary ruling by the EU Cou...
The present article analyzes a relatively unusual case, in which a quasi-investigative journalist,...
Investigative journalism sometimes operates at the limits of the law. This is especially true of wha...
A recent decision of the European Court shows that journalists who commit (minor) offences during ne...
A recent decision of the European Court shows that journalists who commit (minor) offences during ne...
A recent decision by the ECtHR confirms that journalists who are found guilty of a criminal offence ...
In a judgment of 29 March 2016, the Grand Chamber in Bédat v. Switzerland found that a criminal conv...
Short analysis of judgment in case Pentikäinen v. Finland, arrest and criminal prosecution of journa...
The legality and acceptability of some controversial practices by journalists was at the heart of a ...
This article explores an ECJ decision involving a question of first impression, the meaning of journ...
Analysis on judgment ECtHR on defamation and freedom of expression, conflicting right
The European Court’s Second Section found that criminal proceedings against the owner and the editor...
The European Court has once more confirmed the strong protection that is to be given to journalists’...
In a case against Iceland the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) stated that a journalist respon...
A recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) reflects once more the importance of...
After proceedings at national level during eight years, and after a preliminary ruling by the EU Cou...
The present article analyzes a relatively unusual case, in which a quasi-investigative journalist,...