Important sceptical arguments by Sextus Empiricus, Hume and Boghossian (concerning disputes, induction, and relativism respectively) are based on circularities and infinite regresses. Yet, philosophers’ practice does not keep circularities and infinite regresses clearly apart. In this metaphilosophical paper I show how circularity and infinite regress arguments can be made explicit, and shed light on two powerful tools of the sceptic
In this paper I examine the threat of epistemic circularity to our being justified in claim to relia...
One way of mapping part of the domain of epistemology is to represent various theories as responses ...
This book is open access under a CC BY 4.0 license. This book addresses the age-old problem of infin...
Important sceptical arguments by Sextus Empiricus, Hume and Boghossian (concerning disputes, inducti...
Infinite regress arguments play an important role in many distinct philosophical debates. Yet, exact...
Infinite regress arguments play an important role in many distinct philosophical debates. Yet, exact...
Infinite regress arguments are a powerful tool in Aristotle, but this style of argument has received...
This PhD dissertation is on infinite regress arguments in philosophy. Its main goals are to explain ...
This work, the Nature and Value of Scepticism, shows that the metaphilosopby arising from what David...
Call for Papers: Infinite Regress Arguments and Non-Contradiction in Plato and Aristotle Deadline 31...
It is not entirely exaggerated to say that metaphysics is, in fact, a battle of regress arguments. I...
Abstract. Pretheoretically we hold that we cannot gain justification or knowledge through an epistem...
If epistemic circularity is not altogether fallacious, it is at least of dubious merit. To determine...
Within the context of the Quine-Putnam indispensability argument, one discussion about the status of...
This article seeks to state, first, what traditionally has been assumed must be the case in order fo...
In this paper I examine the threat of epistemic circularity to our being justified in claim to relia...
One way of mapping part of the domain of epistemology is to represent various theories as responses ...
This book is open access under a CC BY 4.0 license. This book addresses the age-old problem of infin...
Important sceptical arguments by Sextus Empiricus, Hume and Boghossian (concerning disputes, inducti...
Infinite regress arguments play an important role in many distinct philosophical debates. Yet, exact...
Infinite regress arguments play an important role in many distinct philosophical debates. Yet, exact...
Infinite regress arguments are a powerful tool in Aristotle, but this style of argument has received...
This PhD dissertation is on infinite regress arguments in philosophy. Its main goals are to explain ...
This work, the Nature and Value of Scepticism, shows that the metaphilosopby arising from what David...
Call for Papers: Infinite Regress Arguments and Non-Contradiction in Plato and Aristotle Deadline 31...
It is not entirely exaggerated to say that metaphysics is, in fact, a battle of regress arguments. I...
Abstract. Pretheoretically we hold that we cannot gain justification or knowledge through an epistem...
If epistemic circularity is not altogether fallacious, it is at least of dubious merit. To determine...
Within the context of the Quine-Putnam indispensability argument, one discussion about the status of...
This article seeks to state, first, what traditionally has been assumed must be the case in order fo...
In this paper I examine the threat of epistemic circularity to our being justified in claim to relia...
One way of mapping part of the domain of epistemology is to represent various theories as responses ...
This book is open access under a CC BY 4.0 license. This book addresses the age-old problem of infin...