The Logic of Analogy is a study of the valid logical forms of qualitative and quantitative analogical argument, and the rules pertaining to them. It investigates equally valid conflicting arguments, statistics-based arguments and their utility in science, arguments from precedent used in law-making or law-application, and examines subsumption in analogical terms. Included for purposes of illustration is a large section on Talmudic use of analogical reasoning
John Woods and Brent Hudak’s theory on arguments by analogy (1989), although correct in its meta-arg...
1 Introduction to the Problem In this paper we consider the conditions under whichpropositions infer...
The article addresses some of the specific issues that concern reasoning by analogy in the context o...
This essay (a revised version of my undergraduate honors thesis at Stanford) constructs a theory of ...
Motivation – The purpose of this article is to reinvigorate debate concerning the nature of analogy ...
We use analogy when we say something is a Cinderella story and when we learn about resistors by th...
This doctoral dissertation is a study on analogy-based arguments in law. Its overarching aim is to c...
The thesis defended below is that the arguments associated with many common uses of analogy in reaso...
The present project is twofold. First, it gives a thorough representation of the concept of analogic...
We analyze the logical form of the domain knowledge that grounds analogical inferences and generaliz...
This Article defends the practice of reasoning by analogy on the basis of its epistemic and institut...
This paper deals with two issues in the field of reasoning by analogy in the law. The one issue is w...
Work on analogy has been done from a number of disciplinary perspectives throughout the history of W...
Analogies come in several forms that serve distinct functions. Inductive analogy is a common type of...
Analogical reasoning is one of the most powerful tools of mathematical thinking. For example, to pro...
John Woods and Brent Hudak’s theory on arguments by analogy (1989), although correct in its meta-arg...
1 Introduction to the Problem In this paper we consider the conditions under whichpropositions infer...
The article addresses some of the specific issues that concern reasoning by analogy in the context o...
This essay (a revised version of my undergraduate honors thesis at Stanford) constructs a theory of ...
Motivation – The purpose of this article is to reinvigorate debate concerning the nature of analogy ...
We use analogy when we say something is a Cinderella story and when we learn about resistors by th...
This doctoral dissertation is a study on analogy-based arguments in law. Its overarching aim is to c...
The thesis defended below is that the arguments associated with many common uses of analogy in reaso...
The present project is twofold. First, it gives a thorough representation of the concept of analogic...
We analyze the logical form of the domain knowledge that grounds analogical inferences and generaliz...
This Article defends the practice of reasoning by analogy on the basis of its epistemic and institut...
This paper deals with two issues in the field of reasoning by analogy in the law. The one issue is w...
Work on analogy has been done from a number of disciplinary perspectives throughout the history of W...
Analogies come in several forms that serve distinct functions. Inductive analogy is a common type of...
Analogical reasoning is one of the most powerful tools of mathematical thinking. For example, to pro...
John Woods and Brent Hudak’s theory on arguments by analogy (1989), although correct in its meta-arg...
1 Introduction to the Problem In this paper we consider the conditions under whichpropositions infer...
The article addresses some of the specific issues that concern reasoning by analogy in the context o...