Delayed harvest time affects strength and color parameters in cotton fiber

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is the most widely used natural fiber worldwide in the textile industry, thus maintaining or even improving fiber quality is essential to produce the best quality yarn and uniform fabrics. Final fiber quality properties are determined not only by genotypes or environmental conditions during crop development but can also be affected by other post-maturity factors, such as harvesting and ginning methods, and harvest time. The aim of this study is to associate the different environmental factors that affect specific lint quality traits produced by a delay in harvest time, also assessing cultivar effect. This field study included 4 cotton cultivars evaluated at 7 different harvest times (manual harvested) for different quality parameters. Results indicate that prolonged exposure of cotton fiber to the environment affects lint percentage (LP), strength (Str), reflectance (Rd) and yellowness (+b). Str showed a decrease of 0.02 g tex−1 per day from defoliant application, while LP, Rd and +b presented different rates according to the season. No differences were obtained neither for length nor for fineness and maturity (micronaire) traits. In addition, the analysis of the results together with the climatic data recorded during the experiments indicated a negative correlation between Str, Rd, and +b with the number of rainy days, accumulated precipitation, and frost temperatures. Overall, this study establishes specific relationships between certain fiber characteristics and environmental conditions, being an important tool for crop management with regards to climate predictions that could help to make estimates of economic losses when the harvest is delayed.EEA ReconquistaFil: Scarpin, Gonzalo Joel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; ArgentinaFil: Cereijo, Antonela Estefanía. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; ArgentinaFil: Cereijo, Antonela Estefanía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Cereijo, Antonela Estefanía. Universidad Católica de Santa Fe. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; ArgentinaFil: Dileo, Pablo Nahuel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; ArgentinaFil: Winkler, Horacio Martín. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; ArgentinaFil: Winkler, Horacio Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Muchut, Robertino José. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; ArgentinaFil: Muchut, Robertino José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Muchut, Robertino José. Universidad Católica de Santa Fe. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; ArgentinaFil: Lorenzini, Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; ArgentinaFil: Lorenzini, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Roeschlin, Roxana Andrea. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; ArgentinaFil: Roeschlin, Roxana Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Roeschlin, Roxana Andrea. Universidad Católica de Santa Fe. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; ArgentinaFil: Paytas, Marcelo Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista; Argentin