Add to ORKGDefendant executed and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note and a mortgage securing it. The mortgage contained a covenant to pay $10,000 (the principal amount of the note) according to the terms of a certain promissory note bearing even date herewith. Upon foreclosure it was held, three judges dissenting, that the mortgagee was entitled to a deficiency decree notwithstanding action on the note was barred by the statute of limitations. Guardian Depositors Corporation of Detroit v. Savage, 287 Mich. 193,283 N. W. 26 (1938)
Issuance of the procuration to sell together with the credit agreement is basically contrary to Arti...
Common grantor filed for record a plat of the subdivision in which defendant and plaintiff both own ...
In 1943 the New York State Legislature extended its moratorium legislation for another year, thereby...
Defendant, a Michigan corporation, became a guarantor on a mortgage of land located in Alabama. Both...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
After mortgaging his home to the Home Owners\u27 Loan Corporation under the provisions of the Home O...
This Court has previously held that the Federal Foreclosure Bar preempts NRS 116. 3116 and that a fi...
A mortgaged land to B and thereafter executed a second mortgage on the same land to C. In the second...
Plaintiffs were the owners of two lots in a subdivision originally owned by a real estate developmen...
Plaintiff sued on a clause in a deed in which the grantee assumed and agreed to pay a mortgage indeb...
Plaintiff, a holder, sued for the principal of and interest on matured bearer bonds which were part ...
To secure the purchase price of land, defendant executed a promissory note and first deed of trust i...
Plaintiffs, as landowners in a restricted Detroit subdivision, sought to restrain the defendants fro...
Certain farm owners, intending to subdivide the land, conveyed a lot to plaintiff by a deed restrict...
An interest in certain land was mortgaged by the owners to the plaintiff in October, 1933. This same...
Issuance of the procuration to sell together with the credit agreement is basically contrary to Arti...
Common grantor filed for record a plat of the subdivision in which defendant and plaintiff both own ...
In 1943 the New York State Legislature extended its moratorium legislation for another year, thereby...
Defendant, a Michigan corporation, became a guarantor on a mortgage of land located in Alabama. Both...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
After mortgaging his home to the Home Owners\u27 Loan Corporation under the provisions of the Home O...
This Court has previously held that the Federal Foreclosure Bar preempts NRS 116. 3116 and that a fi...
A mortgaged land to B and thereafter executed a second mortgage on the same land to C. In the second...
Plaintiffs were the owners of two lots in a subdivision originally owned by a real estate developmen...
Plaintiff sued on a clause in a deed in which the grantee assumed and agreed to pay a mortgage indeb...
Plaintiff, a holder, sued for the principal of and interest on matured bearer bonds which were part ...
To secure the purchase price of land, defendant executed a promissory note and first deed of trust i...
Plaintiffs, as landowners in a restricted Detroit subdivision, sought to restrain the defendants fro...
Certain farm owners, intending to subdivide the land, conveyed a lot to plaintiff by a deed restrict...
An interest in certain land was mortgaged by the owners to the plaintiff in October, 1933. This same...
Issuance of the procuration to sell together with the credit agreement is basically contrary to Arti...
Common grantor filed for record a plat of the subdivision in which defendant and plaintiff both own ...
In 1943 the New York State Legislature extended its moratorium legislation for another year, thereby...