Add to ORKGNRS 31.070 outlines a process for determining title to property that is being questioned. The process allows an entity served with a writ of attachment the opportunity to request a hearing to determine the correct title for the property. This process grants an entity, even a third-party entity, standing to challenge a district court’s order by following the process outlined in NRS 31.070
Under NRCP 62(d) and NRCP 62(e), state and local government appellants are generally entitled to a s...
The Court held that condemnation compensation is due to the party who lost a right to property when ...
In an en banc decision, the Nevada Supreme Court considered an issue of first impression regarding N...
NRS 31.070 outlines a process for determining title to property that is being questioned. The proces...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
Under NRS 14.010(1), a party may record a lis pendens “[i]n an action . . . affecting the title or p...
The Court determined that application of NRS § 116.3116(8) which states that “[a] judgment or decree...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 155.190(1)(h) only grants the Court appellate jurisdiction over th...
The Nevada Supreme Court interpreted the NRS 17.030–17.080 judgment debtor statutes and found: (1) t...
The Court held that a servicer of a loan that is owned by a regulated entity does have standing to r...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
The Court considered a writ of mandamus challenging district court orders denying summary judgment o...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered a Petitioner home builder’s petition for writ relief and appeal ...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
Under NRCP 62(d) and NRCP 62(e), state and local government appellants are generally entitled to a s...
The Court held that condemnation compensation is due to the party who lost a right to property when ...
In an en banc decision, the Nevada Supreme Court considered an issue of first impression regarding N...
NRS 31.070 outlines a process for determining title to property that is being questioned. The proces...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
Under NRS 14.010(1), a party may record a lis pendens “[i]n an action . . . affecting the title or p...
The Court determined that application of NRS § 116.3116(8) which states that “[a] judgment or decree...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 155.190(1)(h) only grants the Court appellate jurisdiction over th...
The Nevada Supreme Court interpreted the NRS 17.030–17.080 judgment debtor statutes and found: (1) t...
The Court held that a servicer of a loan that is owned by a regulated entity does have standing to r...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
The Court considered a writ of mandamus challenging district court orders denying summary judgment o...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered a Petitioner home builder’s petition for writ relief and appeal ...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
Under NRCP 62(d) and NRCP 62(e), state and local government appellants are generally entitled to a s...
The Court held that condemnation compensation is due to the party who lost a right to property when ...
In an en banc decision, the Nevada Supreme Court considered an issue of first impression regarding N...