DOIAbstract
Publisher Copyright: © 2024 selection and editorial matter, Rodrigo Borges and Ian Schnee; individual chapters, the contributors.Postprin
Publisher Copyright: © 2024 selection and editorial matter, Rodrigo Borges and Ian Schnee; individual chapters, the contributors.Postprin
Entitlement is conceived as a kind of positive epistemic status, attaching to certain propositions, ...
This thesis has two aims. One is to motivate the claim that challenging what I call a “sameness of e...
Crispin Wright maintains that the architecture of perceptual justification is such that we can acqui...
One type of argument to sceptical paradox proceeds by making a case that a certain kind of metaphysi...
Crispin Wright’s entitlement theory holds that we have non-evidential justification for accepting pr...
In ‘Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free)?’, Crispin Wright presents a unified strategy aga...
One type of argument to sceptical paradox proceeds by making a case that a certain kind of metaphysi...
The focus of this paper is the prima facie plausible view, expressed by the principle of Counter-Clo...
This book offers a defence of Wrightean epistemic entitlement, one of the most prominent approaches ...
The paper starts by describing and clarifying what Williamson calls the consequence fallacy. I show ...
The view that knowledge-yielding single-premise deductive inference must proceed from a known premis...
Crispin Wright’s “Unified Strategy” for addressing some familiar sceptical paradoxes exploits a subt...
I argue that two of the standard axioms of the AGM theory of belief revision stand in the way of it ...
In ‘Evil is Still Evidence: Comments on Almeida’ Robert Bass presents three objections to the centra...
Entitlement is conceived as a kind of positive epistemic status, attaching to certain propositions, ...
This thesis has two aims. One is to motivate the claim that challenging what I call a “sameness of e...
Crispin Wright maintains that the architecture of perceptual justification is such that we can acqui...
One type of argument to sceptical paradox proceeds by making a case that a certain kind of metaphysi...
Crispin Wright’s entitlement theory holds that we have non-evidential justification for accepting pr...
In ‘Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free)?’, Crispin Wright presents a unified strategy aga...
One type of argument to sceptical paradox proceeds by making a case that a certain kind of metaphysi...
The focus of this paper is the prima facie plausible view, expressed by the principle of Counter-Clo...
This book offers a defence of Wrightean epistemic entitlement, one of the most prominent approaches ...
The paper starts by describing and clarifying what Williamson calls the consequence fallacy. I show ...
The view that knowledge-yielding single-premise deductive inference must proceed from a known premis...
Crispin Wright’s “Unified Strategy” for addressing some familiar sceptical paradoxes exploits a subt...
I argue that two of the standard axioms of the AGM theory of belief revision stand in the way of it ...
In ‘Evil is Still Evidence: Comments on Almeida’ Robert Bass presents three objections to the centra...
Entitlement is conceived as a kind of positive epistemic status, attaching to certain propositions, ...
This thesis has two aims. One is to motivate the claim that challenging what I call a “sameness of e...
Crispin Wright maintains that the architecture of perceptual justification is such that we can acqui...
Add to ORKG