The dream of the 1930s is alive in Washington. Democrats see Republicans hemorrhaging voters as Trump struggles with the economy and the pandemic and are salivating at the prospect of retaking not only the White House, but also the Senate. Of course, you should never sell a bearskin until you\u27ve caught the bear. But even a blowout victory can\u27t get Democrats the prize they really want, a Supreme Court majority. So, in back-to-the-future fashion, many progressives are pushing the idea of court packing. After all, in politics, rules are made to be broken
Book review: Supreme power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court. By Jeff Shesol, 2010. New York...
In this Article, I begin by laying a basic theoretical foundation for understanding how language cho...
Part of Symposium: The Sound of Legal Thunder: The Chaotic Consequences Of Crushing Constitutional B...
At several points in history, politicians and commentators have proposed adding seats to the Supreme...
When it comes to court packing, questions of “should” and “can” are inextricably intertwined. The co...
The original arguments against court packing carry less weight in the current social and constitutio...
Proposals to pack the Supreme Court have gained steam recently. Presidential candidate Pete Buttigie...
A Court-packing proposal is imminent. Mainstream Democratic Party Presidential Candidates are alread...
Wide-ranging public discussion of U.S. Supreme Court reform implicates fundamental questions of cons...
This essay, prepared for the Notre Dame Law Review\u27s Symposium, “The American Congress: Legal Imp...
This Article asks whether the openness to court-packing expressed by a number of Democratic presiden...
President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 1937 Court-packing bill would have permitted him to appoint six ad...
Talk of constitutional hardball is in the air. Ever since Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supr...
A Court-packing proposal is imminent. Mainstream Democratic Party Presidential Candidates are alread...
An article from the Social Issues section of Business Week magazine.https://scholarworks.umt.edu/m...
Book review: Supreme power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court. By Jeff Shesol, 2010. New York...
In this Article, I begin by laying a basic theoretical foundation for understanding how language cho...
Part of Symposium: The Sound of Legal Thunder: The Chaotic Consequences Of Crushing Constitutional B...
At several points in history, politicians and commentators have proposed adding seats to the Supreme...
When it comes to court packing, questions of “should” and “can” are inextricably intertwined. The co...
The original arguments against court packing carry less weight in the current social and constitutio...
Proposals to pack the Supreme Court have gained steam recently. Presidential candidate Pete Buttigie...
A Court-packing proposal is imminent. Mainstream Democratic Party Presidential Candidates are alread...
Wide-ranging public discussion of U.S. Supreme Court reform implicates fundamental questions of cons...
This essay, prepared for the Notre Dame Law Review\u27s Symposium, “The American Congress: Legal Imp...
This Article asks whether the openness to court-packing expressed by a number of Democratic presiden...
President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 1937 Court-packing bill would have permitted him to appoint six ad...
Talk of constitutional hardball is in the air. Ever since Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supr...
A Court-packing proposal is imminent. Mainstream Democratic Party Presidential Candidates are alread...
An article from the Social Issues section of Business Week magazine.https://scholarworks.umt.edu/m...
Book review: Supreme power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court. By Jeff Shesol, 2010. New York...
In this Article, I begin by laying a basic theoretical foundation for understanding how language cho...
Part of Symposium: The Sound of Legal Thunder: The Chaotic Consequences Of Crushing Constitutional B...