Lsoelectric focusing phenotyping and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis genotyping: a comparison of two methods in detection of alpha-1-antitrypsin variants

Laboratory diagnosis of alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency is routinely performed by phenotyping methods, which include measurement of serum alpha-1-antitrypsin concentration and isoelectric focusing (IEF). Several DNA-based methods are also used for AAT deficiency testing, but they still have not become part of routine diagnostics. The aim of the study was to identify AAT variants using 2 different methods, isoelectric focusing and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), and to compare obtained results as well as practical application of these 2 methods. The study has encompassed 27 emphysema patients. In all patients, AAT phenotypization was conducted using IEF, whereas genotypization was performed by DGGE. Variations detected by DGGE were characterized by DNA sequencing. Mutations in the AAT gene were detected in 6 patients. Three patients were homozygous for the Z allele, whereas I patient was heterozygous. In 2 patients, novel AAT variants, G320R and V321F, were detected. When results obtained by IEF and DGGE were compared, it was observed that IEF results were inconclusive or misinterpreted in 5 cases (18.5%). Both methods proved to be reliable for detection of the Z alleles, whereas discrepancy existed for M4 allele and rare variants. Therefore, the optimal strategy for diagnostics of AAT deficiency should encompass detection of the most common AAT variants by IEF and screening for the less common variants by DGGE in combination with sequencing