The dispute of Full Jurisdiction in Croatian Law

Nadzor nad zakonitim radom uprave važan je element upravnog prava svake države. Takva zadaća je povjerena sudstvu zbog njegove stručnosti i neovisnosti prema upravi. Kao oblik sudske kontrole javlja se upravni spor. S vremenom su se razvili njegovi različiti oblici, a kao najznačajniji smatraju se spor o zakonitosti i spor pune jurisdikcije. Rad je posvećen sporu pune jurisdikcije. U prvom dijelu se usporedno prikazuju značajke ovih dvaju sporova. Dalje se prikazuje povijesni razvoj spora pune jurisdikcije i razlozi koji su doveli do reforme upravnog sudstva. U zadnjem dijelu se obrađuje spor pune jurisdikcije u kontekstu novog Zakona o upravnim sporovima i upućuje se na probleme koji se u vezi njegove primjene javljaju u praksi.Supervision of the legal work of the administration is an important element of the administrative law of every state. Such a task is entrusted to the judiciary because of its expertise and independence from the administration. An administrative dispute appears as a form of judicial control. Its different forms have developed over time, and the most significant are the legality dispute and the full jurisdiction dispute. This thesis deals with the topic of the dispute of full jurisdiction. The first part compares the features of these two disputes. Next, the historical development of the full jurisdiction dispute and the reasons that led to the reform of the administrative judiciary are presented. The last part deals with the full jurisdiction dispute in the context of the new Law on Administrative Disputes and refers to the problems that arise in practice in connection with its application