Technical performance of a dual-energy CT system with a novel deep-learning based reconstruction process: Evaluation using an abdomen protocol

Background: A new tube voltage-switching dual-energy (DE) CT system using a novel deep-learning based reconstruction process has been introduced. Characterizing the performance of this DE approach can help demonstrate its benefits and potential drawbacks. Purpose: To evaluate the technical performance of a novel DECT system and compare it to that of standard single-kV CT and a rotate/rotate DECT, for abdominal imaging. Methods: DE and single-kV images of four different phantoms were acquired on a kV-switching DECT system, and on a rotate/rotate DECT. The dose for the acquisitions of each phantom was set to that selected for the kV-switching DE mode by the automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) at manufacturer-recommended settings. The dose that the ATCM would have selected in single-kV mode was also recorded. Virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) from 40 to 130 keV, as well as iodine maps, were reconstructed from the DE data. Single-kV images, acquired at 120 kV, were reconstructed using body hybrid iterative reconstruction. All reconstructions were made at 0.5 mm section thickness. Task transfer functions (TTFs) were determined for a Teflon and LDPE rod. Noise magnitude (SD), and noise power spectrum (NPS) were calculated using 240 and 320 mm diameter water phantoms. Iodine quantification accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) relative to water for 2, 5, 10, and 15 mg I/ml were determined using a multi-energy CT (MECT) phantom. Low-contrast visibility was determined and the presence of beam-hardening artifacts and inhomogeneities were evaluated. Results: The TTFs of the kV-switching DE VMIs were higher than that of the single-kV images for Teflon (20% TTF: 6.8 lp/cm at 40 keV, 6.2 lp/cm for single-kV), while for LDPE the DE TTFs at 70 keV and above were equivalent or higher than the single-kV TTF. All TTFs of the kV-switching DECT were higher than for the rotate/rotate DECT. The SD was lowest in the 70 keV VMI (12.0 HU), which was lower than that of single-kV (18.3 HU). The average NPS frequency varied between 2.3 lp/cm and 4.2 lp/cm for the kV-switching VMIs and was 2.2 lp/cm for single-kV. The error in iodine quantification was at maximum 1 mg I/ml (at 5 mg I/ml). The highest CNR for all iodine concentrations was at 60 keV, 2.5 times higher than the CNR for single-kV. At 70–90 keV, the number of visible low contrast objects was comparable to that in single-kV, while other VMIs showed fewer objects. At manufacturer-recommended ATCM settings, the CTDIvol for the DE acquisitions of the water and MECT phantoms were 12.6 and 15.4 mGy, respectively, and higher than that for single-kV. The 70 keV VMI had less severe beam hardening artifacts than single-kV images. Hyper- and hypo-dense blotches may appear in VMIs when object attenuation exceeds manufacturer recommended limits. Conclusions: At manufacturer-recommended ATCM settings for abdominal imaging, this DE implementation results in higher CTDIvol compared to single-kV acquisitions. However, it can create sharper, lower noise VMIs with up to 2.5 times higher iodine CNR compared to single-kV images acquired at the same dose