Perhaps no inventor or invention was as pivotal to the British industrial revolution than James Watt and his separate condenser. By radically improving the fuel efficiency of steam engines, Watt’s condenser was instrumental to steam’s adoption as a power source in a plethora of industrial activities. However, Watt’s patent for the condenser, obtained in 1769 and extended to 1800, is frequently invoked as a classic example of a “blocking” patent, used to stymie subsequent technical developments in steam engineering, in turn delaying industrialization. The chapter refutes this claim using new archival materials, which show that Watt and his business partner Matthew Boulton were reluctant litigators who were ultimately willing to license their...
This paper was written in order to examine the conditions needed, and the order of the discoveries m...
In this paper, we argue that together with individual inventors and firms, what Robert C. Allen (198...
In an earlier comment on Boldrin and Levines 2003 lecture on patents and their effect on technology,...
Great Britain (GB) was the first country to undergo an Industrial Revolution (1760-1850) and, in con...
James Watt (1736-1819) was a pivotal figure of the Industrial Revolution. His career as a scientific...
The Soho Manufactory in Birmingham is renowned, rightly, for its prodigious output of material objec...
Continuing this new series of Science Stories, Naomi Alderman tells the story of James Watt and the ...
The steam engine, invented and patented in 1769 by James Watt, then marketed by him in association w...
This paper surveys the recent historiography of three national patent systems during the period of t...
In their 2003 Lawrence R. Klein Lecture, Michele Boldrin and David Levine argue that intellectual pr...
International audienceBased on unpublished correspondence and legal acts, the article tells an unkno...
There are two competing accounts for explaining Britain's technological transformation during the In...
There are two competing accounts for explaining Britain's technological transformation during the In...
This thesis examines the relationship between the English patent system and early railway-related in...
Something about William Murdock, whose efforts not only helped James Watt, but are still making life...
This paper was written in order to examine the conditions needed, and the order of the discoveries m...
In this paper, we argue that together with individual inventors and firms, what Robert C. Allen (198...
In an earlier comment on Boldrin and Levines 2003 lecture on patents and their effect on technology,...
Great Britain (GB) was the first country to undergo an Industrial Revolution (1760-1850) and, in con...
James Watt (1736-1819) was a pivotal figure of the Industrial Revolution. His career as a scientific...
The Soho Manufactory in Birmingham is renowned, rightly, for its prodigious output of material objec...
Continuing this new series of Science Stories, Naomi Alderman tells the story of James Watt and the ...
The steam engine, invented and patented in 1769 by James Watt, then marketed by him in association w...
This paper surveys the recent historiography of three national patent systems during the period of t...
In their 2003 Lawrence R. Klein Lecture, Michele Boldrin and David Levine argue that intellectual pr...
International audienceBased on unpublished correspondence and legal acts, the article tells an unkno...
There are two competing accounts for explaining Britain's technological transformation during the In...
There are two competing accounts for explaining Britain's technological transformation during the In...
This thesis examines the relationship between the English patent system and early railway-related in...
Something about William Murdock, whose efforts not only helped James Watt, but are still making life...
This paper was written in order to examine the conditions needed, and the order of the discoveries m...
In this paper, we argue that together with individual inventors and firms, what Robert C. Allen (198...
In an earlier comment on Boldrin and Levines 2003 lecture on patents and their effect on technology,...