This article analyzes the approaches to assessing the proportionality of fines imposed by civil asset forfeiture. In many cases, fines imposed by civil asset forfeiture consist of property. Without clear Supreme Court guidance on the matter of evaluating just what makes a fine “excessive,” I turned to the proportionality jurisprudence from the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause. While many circuits have proposed their own tests for excessive fines imposed through forfeiture, I propose an objective multi-factor test that will measure a fine’s proportionality to avoid excessiveness
In 1971, agents of the federal government seized a $20,000 yaught after finding a small quantity of ...
This Article addresses the timely and controversial topic of constitutional limits on punitive damag...
This article highlights the circuit split that has recently emerged regarding the Eighth Amendment\u...
In Timbs v. Indiana, Petitioner Tyson Timbs asks the Supreme Court to incorporate the Excessive Fine...
In Timbs v. Indiana, Petitioner Tyson Timbs asks the Supreme Court to incorporate the Excessive Fine...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Timbs v. Indiana buoyed the hopes of those who saw it as a powe...
On February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in Timbs v. In...
Part I of this Article reviews the case law regarding judicial review of both terms of imprisonment ...
The article offers solutions to further the conversation regarding the U.S. constitution\u27s Eighth...
Civil forfeiture laws permit the government to seize and forfeit private property that has allegedly...
This Note explores whether courts should look beyond the broad language in Ingraham v. Wright and sc...
Punishment for drug crimes includes not only penal sanctions, but economic sanctions in the form of ...
This Article addresses the timely and controversial topic of constitutional limits on punitive damag...
In 1971, agents of the federal government seized a $20,000 yaught after finding a small quantity of ...
In 1971, agents of the federal government seized a $20,000 yaught after finding a small quantity of ...
In 1971, agents of the federal government seized a $20,000 yaught after finding a small quantity of ...
This Article addresses the timely and controversial topic of constitutional limits on punitive damag...
This article highlights the circuit split that has recently emerged regarding the Eighth Amendment\u...
In Timbs v. Indiana, Petitioner Tyson Timbs asks the Supreme Court to incorporate the Excessive Fine...
In Timbs v. Indiana, Petitioner Tyson Timbs asks the Supreme Court to incorporate the Excessive Fine...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Timbs v. Indiana buoyed the hopes of those who saw it as a powe...
On February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in Timbs v. In...
Part I of this Article reviews the case law regarding judicial review of both terms of imprisonment ...
The article offers solutions to further the conversation regarding the U.S. constitution\u27s Eighth...
Civil forfeiture laws permit the government to seize and forfeit private property that has allegedly...
This Note explores whether courts should look beyond the broad language in Ingraham v. Wright and sc...
Punishment for drug crimes includes not only penal sanctions, but economic sanctions in the form of ...
This Article addresses the timely and controversial topic of constitutional limits on punitive damag...
In 1971, agents of the federal government seized a $20,000 yaught after finding a small quantity of ...
In 1971, agents of the federal government seized a $20,000 yaught after finding a small quantity of ...
In 1971, agents of the federal government seized a $20,000 yaught after finding a small quantity of ...
This Article addresses the timely and controversial topic of constitutional limits on punitive damag...
This article highlights the circuit split that has recently emerged regarding the Eighth Amendment\u...