The effect of various breath-hold techniques on the cardiorespiratory response to facial immersion in humans

This is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recordData availability statement: All data supporting the results of the paper are available as Supporting Information.NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? What is the effect of three repeated breath-hold techniques routinely used by freedivers, thought to manipulate arterial partial pressures of O2 and CO2 , on the cardiorespiratory and haematological response to breath-holding during facial immersion? What is the main finding and its importance? All three techniques increased breath-hold by a similar duration, probably owing to the similar marked increase in end-tidal O2 and decrease in end-tidal CO2 observed in all three trials before facial immersion. These were the only cardiorespiratory changes that were consistently manipulated before the maximal breath-hold. This would suggest that pronounced bradycardia and vasoconstriction of selective vascular beds are probably not obligatory for prolonging breath-hold duration. ABSTRACT: Repeated maximal breath-holds have been demonstrated to induce bradycardia, increase haematocrit and haemoglobin and prolong subsequent breath-hold duration by 20%. Freedivers use non-maximal breath-hold techniques (BHTs) to improve breath-hold duration. The aim of this study was to investigate the cardiorespiratory and haematological responses to various BHTs. Ten healthy men (34.5 ± 1.9 years) attended five randomized experimental trials and performed a 40 min period of quiet rest or one of three BHTs followed by a maximal breath-hold challenge during facial immersion in water at 30 or 10°C. Cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were measured continuously using finger plethysmography and breath-by-breath gas analysis, respectively, and venous blood samples were collected throughout. Facial immersion in cold water caused marked bradycardia (74.1 vs. 50.2 beats/min after 40 s) but did not increase breath-hold duration compared with warm water control conditions. Facial immersion breath-hold duration was 30.8-43.3% greater than the control duration when preceded by BHTs that involved repeated breath-holds of constant duration (P = 0.021), increasing duration (P 0.05). In conclusion, the duration of apnoea can be extended by manipulating blood gases through repeated prior breath-holds, but changes in cardiac output and red blood cell mass do not appear essential.Royal Nav