Alternative treatments for autism: Prevalence and predictors

Autism is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorder for which a large variety of treatments are offered, including alternative treatments. Vaccine-related treatments (treatments falsely claiming to cure autism by addressing its alleged cause: routine childhood vaccines such as MMR) continue to be offered worldwide, despite widespread evidence against the effectiveness and even possible harm related to these treatments. We analysed the use of alternative treatments in two studies: a survey study (N = 1989, autistic adults and parents/legal representatives of individuals with autism) and a clinical care study (N = 4520, patient files from a treatment center for autism). Both studies found a relatively high frequency of alternative treatments (23.0–30.7%) – in children even 46.4% -, mostly in combination with mainstream treatment. In the survey study vaccine-related treatments were used by 3.2% of all individuals with autism (and 6.7% of autistic children), and alternative treatment use was predicted by co-occurring diagnoses, younger age of diagnosis and mainstream treatment use. In the clinical care study, patients who had received treatment from a homeo-/osteopath more often had highly educated parents from Dutch/Western background and were more often enrolled in special education. Alternative treatments are widely used and should be included in treatment guidelines. Parents, practitioners and individuals with autism should be both advised and warned about the benefits and risks of these treatments. More research is needed to better understand the choice for and effect of alternative treatments for autism, and mainstream care should be improved