Objective: To undertake an economic evaluation alongside the largest randomised controlled trial comparing Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (‘LNG-IUS’) and usual medical treatment for women with menorrhagia in primary care; and compare the cost-effectiveness findings using two alternative measures of quality of life. Methods: 571 women with menorrhagia from 63 UK centres were randomised between February 2005 and July 2009. Women were randomised to having a LNG-IUS fitted, or usual medical treatment, after discussing with their general practitioner their contraceptive needs or desire to avoid hormonal treatment. The treatment was specified prior to randomisation. For the economic evaluation we developed a state transition (Mar...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs and non-inferiority of a strategy starting with the LNG-IUS compare...
© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2015. Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a commo...
Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding is an important health problem. Two frequently used therapies a...
To undertake an economic evaluation alongside the largest randomised controlled trial comparing Levo...
OBJECTIVE: To undertake an economic evaluation alongside the largest randomised controlled trial com...
Objective: To undertake an economic evaluation alongside the largest randomised controlled trial com...
Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common problem, yet evidence to inform decisions abo...
To compare the cost and effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) ...
Objective: To determine whether the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS), licensed...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs and non-inferiority of a strategy starting with the LNG-IUS compare...
Background: The extra-welfarist theoretical framework tends to focus on health-related quality of li...
Source of support: Self financing Background: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of th...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs and non-inferiority of a strategy starting with the LNG-IUS compare...
© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2015. Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a commo...
Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding is an important health problem. Two frequently used therapies a...
To undertake an economic evaluation alongside the largest randomised controlled trial comparing Levo...
OBJECTIVE: To undertake an economic evaluation alongside the largest randomised controlled trial com...
Objective: To undertake an economic evaluation alongside the largest randomised controlled trial com...
Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common problem, yet evidence to inform decisions abo...
To compare the cost and effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) ...
Objective: To determine whether the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS), licensed...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs and non-inferiority of a strategy starting with the LNG-IUS compare...
Background: The extra-welfarist theoretical framework tends to focus on health-related quality of li...
Source of support: Self financing Background: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of th...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs and non-inferiority of a strategy starting with the LNG-IUS compare...
© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2015. Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a commo...
Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding is an important health problem. Two frequently used therapies a...