Most Significant Features Comparison with lowest p-value of a. Betel quid (Males) Chewers Vs. Non-Chewers; b. Betel quid Chewers Vs. Alcoholic-Smoker Chewers. (TIF)</p
The non-nutritive suck variables are compared during FACES (gray), CARS (black) and looking away fro...
<p>Comparison of subject distributions and patient characteristics between upper and lower halves in...
Composites of 15 faces that scored highest and lowest in the two components of male and female faces...
Most Significant Features Comparison with lowest p-value of a. Betel Quid Vs. Smoker Chewers; b. Bet...
Most Significant Features Comparison with lowest p-value of a. Betel quid chewers Vs. Non-Chewers; b...
a. Genus-level oral microbiome Unique OTU elements composition of Betel quid Male chewers Vs. Non-Ch...
<p>Characteristics of betel quid chewing practice among the respondents who currently chewed betel q...
<p>Comparison of life expectancy among inactive chewers, active chewers, and general population.</p
<p>All models include the variable age/sex class: FLM = flanged male; NUF = nulliparous independent ...
<p>Comparison of demographic and anthropometric characteristics between low and normal vitamin D gro...
<p>Comparison of ocular features between non-secreted and secreted XLRS groups.</p
The bacterial OTUs that could not be assigned to a genus are represented as “Unclassified” and are a...
A: comparison between the high-fat (HF) and the low-fat (LF) group. B: comparison among all groups w...
<p>Comparison of mandibular measurements between the hard- and soft-diet groups.</p
<p>Comparison of panoramic radiographs by different methods on the closed-bite shaped dental CBCT da...
The non-nutritive suck variables are compared during FACES (gray), CARS (black) and looking away fro...
<p>Comparison of subject distributions and patient characteristics between upper and lower halves in...
Composites of 15 faces that scored highest and lowest in the two components of male and female faces...
Most Significant Features Comparison with lowest p-value of a. Betel Quid Vs. Smoker Chewers; b. Bet...
Most Significant Features Comparison with lowest p-value of a. Betel quid chewers Vs. Non-Chewers; b...
a. Genus-level oral microbiome Unique OTU elements composition of Betel quid Male chewers Vs. Non-Ch...
<p>Characteristics of betel quid chewing practice among the respondents who currently chewed betel q...
<p>Comparison of life expectancy among inactive chewers, active chewers, and general population.</p
<p>All models include the variable age/sex class: FLM = flanged male; NUF = nulliparous independent ...
<p>Comparison of demographic and anthropometric characteristics between low and normal vitamin D gro...
<p>Comparison of ocular features between non-secreted and secreted XLRS groups.</p
The bacterial OTUs that could not be assigned to a genus are represented as “Unclassified” and are a...
A: comparison between the high-fat (HF) and the low-fat (LF) group. B: comparison among all groups w...
<p>Comparison of mandibular measurements between the hard- and soft-diet groups.</p
<p>Comparison of panoramic radiographs by different methods on the closed-bite shaped dental CBCT da...
The non-nutritive suck variables are compared during FACES (gray), CARS (black) and looking away fro...
<p>Comparison of subject distributions and patient characteristics between upper and lower halves in...
Composites of 15 faces that scored highest and lowest in the two components of male and female faces...
DOI
Add to ORKG