Add to ORKGAny discussion of Judge Pecora\u27s declaration of a mistrial in People v. Hines must adhere firmly to the fundamental proposition that every accused person, no matter how evident his guilt nor how great the hostility toward him, is entitled to a fair trial, conducted in accord with established rules, and to the verdict of a jury uninfluenced by improper factors. But did the judge\u27s ruling perhaps exceed what was reasonably necessary to assure the defendant of these essentials
Following his arrest for murder, the defendant was held thirty-six hours before being arraigned for ...
The petitioner was convicted of perjury. The trial judge refused to give the following instruction t...
Although the early history of the jurata shows it to have been chosen from among those who were fami...
Any discussion of Judge Pecora\u27s declaration of a mistrial in People v. Hines must adhere firmly ...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
In a prosecution for murder the prosecuting attorney, in his opening address, improperly stated that...
Defendant was convicted of selling whiskey and imprisoned in the county jail. After the time for app...
Appellant who was convicted of committing a criminal abortion, moved for a new trial alleging as err...
Whether or not the judge in a criminal trial is required to charge the jury on a lesser included off...
On trial in a district court for bribing a federal revenue agent, defendant called five witnesses to...
In an action against the manufacturer for damages caused by a defect in an automobile, the jury retu...
The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. At the trial, certain incompetent testimo...
In a prosecution for murder, a special venire was summoned and a list thereof served on the accused....
The jury, in an action for trespass, returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and thereafter sep...
The defendant was convicted of negligent homicide as the result of a collision between his car and a...
Following his arrest for murder, the defendant was held thirty-six hours before being arraigned for ...
The petitioner was convicted of perjury. The trial judge refused to give the following instruction t...
Although the early history of the jurata shows it to have been chosen from among those who were fami...
Any discussion of Judge Pecora\u27s declaration of a mistrial in People v. Hines must adhere firmly ...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
In a prosecution for murder the prosecuting attorney, in his opening address, improperly stated that...
Defendant was convicted of selling whiskey and imprisoned in the county jail. After the time for app...
Appellant who was convicted of committing a criminal abortion, moved for a new trial alleging as err...
Whether or not the judge in a criminal trial is required to charge the jury on a lesser included off...
On trial in a district court for bribing a federal revenue agent, defendant called five witnesses to...
In an action against the manufacturer for damages caused by a defect in an automobile, the jury retu...
The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. At the trial, certain incompetent testimo...
In a prosecution for murder, a special venire was summoned and a list thereof served on the accused....
The jury, in an action for trespass, returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and thereafter sep...
The defendant was convicted of negligent homicide as the result of a collision between his car and a...
Following his arrest for murder, the defendant was held thirty-six hours before being arraigned for ...
The petitioner was convicted of perjury. The trial judge refused to give the following instruction t...
Although the early history of the jurata shows it to have been chosen from among those who were fami...