Evaluation of Criteria for Out-of-Plane Stability of Steel Arch Bridges in Major Design Codes by FE Analysis

The provisions for out-of-plane stability of steel arch bridges in three major design codes are presented in this paper. By employing an existing steel arch bridge as a model, the influence of bridge type, arch rib to lateral bracing stiffness ratio, rise-to-span ratio, arch rib spacing, and range of lateral bracing arrangements on the out-of-plane critical axial force of the arch rib is studied using FE analysis. The accuracy of the critical axial force provisions is then evaluated against the FE analysis. The results show that the influence of the rise-to-span ratio on critical axial force is generally small. The critical axial force decreases with increasing arch rib spacing when the stiffness ratio is relatively large. A smaller ratio of arch rib length provided with lateral bracing (γ-value) significantly reduces the critical axial force and normalized critical axial force decreases with increasing stiffness ratio. The critical axial force of half-through type arch bridges is lowest when the stiffness ratio is relatively small. A deck-type bridge has a larger critical axial force than a through-type bridge when the stiffness ratio is relatively large, while the results are the opposite when the ratio is small. The different assumptions made in the provisions result in the various parameters having different impacts on the out-of-plane critical axial force in each code, thus affecting code accuracy. Considering the influence of the rise-to-span ratio, ratio of lateral bracing, and arch rib spacing with different stiffness ratios, factors to improve the accuracy of the critical axial force obtained by the three codes are proposed for a practical design process