A study on the Impact of the Treatment Process of the Sexual Offender participating the Post-Sentence Compulsory Treatment Program

[[abstract]] 本研究旨在瞭解加害者接受刑後強制治療方案的歷程，以及加害者復歸社會後的生活經驗，藉以探討刑後強制治療制度對於加害者復歸社會過程的影響。本研究採取質性研究方法，以半結構式的訪談大綱進行深入訪談兩名具有接受刑後強制治療經驗之加害者，得到下列研究結果：一、性侵害加害者接受刑後強制治療的經驗：無明確治療期限的壓力促使加害者配合治療；不同治療形式間的治療內容並無差異；抗拒在團體治療內討論案情；加害者對於行為責任的認知與未通過評估時的情緒有關聯；治療處所環境與監所管理員的管理方式，攸關著加害者接受強制治療時的生活穩定。二、刑後強制治療與其他強制治療制度的異同：再犯預防模式是性侵害強制治療制度之間共同的課程；僅有刑後強制治療制度會安排加害者同時參與個別治療與團體治療；在治療過程有模擬演練的機會，是刑後強制治療與其他強制治療制度的不同之處。三、刑後強制治療經驗對於加害者復歸社會之影響：改變行為決策方式；對於異性的態度及互動方式有改變；調整生活的態度與價值觀；加害者曾運用再犯預防的概念中止性犯罪行為，並在生活上減少接觸性犯罪的危險因子；「無明確的治療期限」、「治療期間無法折抵刑期」是嚇阻加害者不敢輕易再度犯案的原因；家庭關係變化與家人支持，對於加害者參與治療動機、改變行為意願、適應生活壓力有影響。 依據研究結果，證明刑後強制治療制度對於減少加害者再犯性侵案件有一定成效，並依研究結果提出對於實務工作與政策制定之建議。[[abstract]] This research explored the impact of the system of Post-sentencing compulsory treatment on the rehabilitation process of the offenders by understanding the course of the Post-sentencing compulsory treatment programs received by sexual offenders and the offenders’ life experiences after leaving the treatment place. This research adopted qualitative research method and conducted in-depth interviews with a semi-structured interview outline. The research interviewed two offenders as subjects who had received Post-sentencing compulsory treatment. The following research results were obtained: The experience of sexual offenders receiving Post-sentencing compulsory treatment: Undecided treatment period made offenders feel stressed while participating in therapy courses, and then forced the offenders to involve in the treatment. There was little different between group and individual therapy. The offenders were resistant to discuss their cases within group therapy. The perception of behavioral responsibilities of offenders was related to the emotion of evaluation fails. The environment of the treatment place and the management style of the supervisors of the prison were all related to the stability of the offenders’ life when receiving compulsory treatment. Similarities and differences between Post-sentencing compulsory treatment and other compulsory treatment systems: The recidivism prevention (RP) model is a common treatment course in the current sexual offender compulsory treatment system. Only Post-sentencing compulsory treatment arranges the offenders to conduct individual and group treatment at the same time. There is an opportunity for simulation exercises in the treatment process, which is the difference between Post-sentence compulsory treatment and other compulsory treatment systems. The Impact of Post-sentencing compulsory treatment experience on the rehabilitation of sexual offenders: The way the offenders changed the behavior decision. The offenders attitude towards the opposite sex and the way of interaction have changed. The offenders would readjust their attitudes and values towards their lives. The offenders applied the concept of recidivism prevention to abort sexual crimes, reducing encounter the risk factors of sexual crime in their daily lives. "Undecided treatment period" and "the period of treatment are not able to deducted from the sentence" were the main reasons why the offenders were so afraid of Post-sentencing compulsory treatment and dare not commit crimes easily again. Changes in family relationships and family support have an impact on the offenders’ motivation to participate in treatment, willingness to change behavior, and ability to adapt to life stress. Based on the research results, it proves that the post-sentence compulsory treatment system has a certain effect on reducing sexual offenders' re-sexual crimes, and accordingly puts forward suggestions for practical work and policy formulation