Union officials wrongfully discharged plaintiffs from the union. Plaintiffs, being unable to procure employment in a closed-shop trade, asked for a writ of mandamus to direct defendants, as representatives of the association, to reinstate plaintiffs and recompense them for damages suffered. Held, that a reinstatement order and a damage judgment against the union should be granted. Nissen v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc., (Iowa, 1941) 295 N. W. 858
Collective bargaining agreements protect unionized workers by prohibiting discharges for other than ...
Plaintiff, discharged by his employer on the ground that he was no longer physically able to work, e...
The appellant (defendant in the case below) and certain of its members were found guilty of unfair l...
Union officials wrongfully discharged plaintiffs from the union. Plaintiffs, being unable to procure...
Plaintiff sued defendant trade union, an unincorporated association, in its association name in a co...
Plaintiff brought suit in a district court of the United States against the defendant union in its c...
Plaintiff, a Wisconsin labor union, was granted a temporary injunction restraining defendant shoe co...
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant corporation, and an officer of the union accredited as bargai...
Plaintiff corporation and defendant union entered into a collective bargaining agreement which provi...
The National Labor Relations Board found on complaint of a rival union that Bowman Transportation, I...
An interstate trucking concern with depots in numerous cities, was approached by a union seeking rec...
Both the Brewery Workers Union and the Teamsters Union, members of the American Federation of Labor,...
Plaintiff, a Michigan trucking company subject to the LMRA, brought suit in a Michigan court agains...
Defendant, a theatre owner, in March, 1939, entered into a collective bargaining contract with a loc...
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike wa...
Collective bargaining agreements protect unionized workers by prohibiting discharges for other than ...
Plaintiff, discharged by his employer on the ground that he was no longer physically able to work, e...
The appellant (defendant in the case below) and certain of its members were found guilty of unfair l...
Union officials wrongfully discharged plaintiffs from the union. Plaintiffs, being unable to procure...
Plaintiff sued defendant trade union, an unincorporated association, in its association name in a co...
Plaintiff brought suit in a district court of the United States against the defendant union in its c...
Plaintiff, a Wisconsin labor union, was granted a temporary injunction restraining defendant shoe co...
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant corporation, and an officer of the union accredited as bargai...
Plaintiff corporation and defendant union entered into a collective bargaining agreement which provi...
The National Labor Relations Board found on complaint of a rival union that Bowman Transportation, I...
An interstate trucking concern with depots in numerous cities, was approached by a union seeking rec...
Both the Brewery Workers Union and the Teamsters Union, members of the American Federation of Labor,...
Plaintiff, a Michigan trucking company subject to the LMRA, brought suit in a Michigan court agains...
Defendant, a theatre owner, in March, 1939, entered into a collective bargaining contract with a loc...
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike wa...
Collective bargaining agreements protect unionized workers by prohibiting discharges for other than ...
Plaintiff, discharged by his employer on the ground that he was no longer physically able to work, e...
The appellant (defendant in the case below) and certain of its members were found guilty of unfair l...