The appellant (defendant in the case below) and certain of its members were found guilty of unfair labor practices as defined by the Wisconsin Employment Relations Act. Plaintiff-appellee issued a cease and desist order, which was sustained by the lower court despite defendant\u27s contention that the statute was unconstitutional on the ground that Congress had precluded such state legislation affecting interstate industries by enacting the National Labor Relations Act. Held, plaintiff\u27s order sustained. State legislation not repugnant to the Wagner Act is operative in this field so long as the National Labor Relations Board has not acted in the particular matter. Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111, United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers o...
The petitioning labor union made a contract with defendant employer, who was engaged solely in inter...
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant corporation, and an officer of the union accredited as bargai...
Plaintiff was a wholesale ice distributor, selling ice to independent contractors. Defendants were m...
The appellant (defendant in the case below) and certain of its members were found guilty of unfair l...
The!! National Labor Relations Board proceeded against defendant corporation, which was admittedly e...
Appellant, a local union of the American Federation of Labor, sought a declaratory judgment and equi...
In 1948, petitioner-union of the employees of the transit system in the City of Milwaukee called a s...
Plaintiff, a Wisconsin labor union, was granted a temporary injunction restraining defendant shoe co...
Extensive federal labor legislation under the commerce clause has created a perplexing jurisdictiona...
Organized labor has long contested the use of the injunction in labor disputes and since the turn of...
The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court\u27s enforcement of an order obtained by the ...
During the first months of the current year, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down thre...
In three recent cases, the United States Supreme Court has been required to determine the impact of ...
In an indictment under the .first paragraph of the Sherman Act the government charged the defendant ...
In the spring of 1937 the respondent distributed anti-union literature to its employees. Some of the...
The petitioning labor union made a contract with defendant employer, who was engaged solely in inter...
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant corporation, and an officer of the union accredited as bargai...
Plaintiff was a wholesale ice distributor, selling ice to independent contractors. Defendants were m...
The appellant (defendant in the case below) and certain of its members were found guilty of unfair l...
The!! National Labor Relations Board proceeded against defendant corporation, which was admittedly e...
Appellant, a local union of the American Federation of Labor, sought a declaratory judgment and equi...
In 1948, petitioner-union of the employees of the transit system in the City of Milwaukee called a s...
Plaintiff, a Wisconsin labor union, was granted a temporary injunction restraining defendant shoe co...
Extensive federal labor legislation under the commerce clause has created a perplexing jurisdictiona...
Organized labor has long contested the use of the injunction in labor disputes and since the turn of...
The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court\u27s enforcement of an order obtained by the ...
During the first months of the current year, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down thre...
In three recent cases, the United States Supreme Court has been required to determine the impact of ...
In an indictment under the .first paragraph of the Sherman Act the government charged the defendant ...
In the spring of 1937 the respondent distributed anti-union literature to its employees. Some of the...
The petitioning labor union made a contract with defendant employer, who was engaged solely in inter...
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant corporation, and an officer of the union accredited as bargai...
Plaintiff was a wholesale ice distributor, selling ice to independent contractors. Defendants were m...