Three mills, all under the same management and represented by the same bargaining agents, were ordered by the National Labor Relations Board to desist from refusing to bargain with the Textile Workers\u27 Organizing Committee. On application by the board to the court for a decree enforcing the order, the company claimed that the committee was not the lawful bargaining agency at the material dates. The T. W. O. C. had been certified by the board after an election in which a majority of the employees voted and a bare majority of these voted for the committee. In no instance were those voting for the committee a majority of the employees in the appropriate unit. Held, that since there is no express provision in the National Labor Relations Act...
The amended National Labor Relations Act (the Act) guarantees that employers, employees, and labor ...
Respondent, representing a labor organization, petitioned the National Labor Relations Board for cer...
This article previews the Supreme Court case NLRB v. Action Automotive, Inc., 469 U.S. 490 (1985). T...
Three mills, all under the same management and represented by the same bargaining agents, were order...
The National Labor Relations Board found that the employer (respondent) had been guilty of unfair la...
The Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., a Pennsylvania corporation, had six plants in its plate glass divisi...
One month after the employer and the union entered into a two-year contract containing a union-shop ...
Petitioner union was certified as exclusive bargaining representative of an employees\u27 unit in 19...
The National Labor Relations Board found on complaint of a rival union that Bowman Transportation, I...
Current Board policy forbids issuing a bargaining order in this situation, where there is no objecti...
This Note evaluates these competing standards in light of the two major policy objectives of the NLR...
The National Labor Relations Act created the National Labor Re- lations Board (NLRB) and vested the ...
More than a decade after the publication of Law and Reality, the debate continues over the proper sc...
This article undercuts Linden Lumber — the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB’s) rule which for ...
Petitioner-cross-respondent Sears Roebuck & Company seeks review of a National Labor Relations Board...
The amended National Labor Relations Act (the Act) guarantees that employers, employees, and labor ...
Respondent, representing a labor organization, petitioned the National Labor Relations Board for cer...
This article previews the Supreme Court case NLRB v. Action Automotive, Inc., 469 U.S. 490 (1985). T...
Three mills, all under the same management and represented by the same bargaining agents, were order...
The National Labor Relations Board found that the employer (respondent) had been guilty of unfair la...
The Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., a Pennsylvania corporation, had six plants in its plate glass divisi...
One month after the employer and the union entered into a two-year contract containing a union-shop ...
Petitioner union was certified as exclusive bargaining representative of an employees\u27 unit in 19...
The National Labor Relations Board found on complaint of a rival union that Bowman Transportation, I...
Current Board policy forbids issuing a bargaining order in this situation, where there is no objecti...
This Note evaluates these competing standards in light of the two major policy objectives of the NLR...
The National Labor Relations Act created the National Labor Re- lations Board (NLRB) and vested the ...
More than a decade after the publication of Law and Reality, the debate continues over the proper sc...
This article undercuts Linden Lumber — the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB’s) rule which for ...
Petitioner-cross-respondent Sears Roebuck & Company seeks review of a National Labor Relations Board...
The amended National Labor Relations Act (the Act) guarantees that employers, employees, and labor ...
Respondent, representing a labor organization, petitioned the National Labor Relations Board for cer...
This article previews the Supreme Court case NLRB v. Action Automotive, Inc., 469 U.S. 490 (1985). T...