The recent decision by the Supreme Court in United States v. Jacobs deals with the troublesome issue of retroactivity under the federal estate tax law. The decedent whose estate was involved in this case had paid the entire consideration for certain real estate which was conveyed to himself and his wife as joint tenants. This transaction took place in 1909. The decedent died in 1924, shortly after the effective date of the Revenue Act of that year. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue included the entire value of the real estate in the decedent\u27s gross estate. The executors paid the tax under protest and sued to recover. The district court held that only half the value of the real estate could be included in the gross estate. The circuit...
The executors of three different estates elected the optional valuation date provided in the federal...
This case presents an issue regarding the constitutionality of retroactive taxes. In December 1987, ...
Section 2036(a) hauls back into a decedent’s gross estate, for federal estate tax purposes, property...
The recent decision by the Supreme Court in United States v. Jacobs deals with the troublesome issue...
An inter vivas trust created by testator and property held jointly with his wife were included in hi...
In 1929 the decedent established a trust, reserving a life estate in the income. On the termination ...
Under Section 811 (e)(2), (g)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by sections 402 and 404 of...
In United States v. Carlton, the Supreme Court rejected a Due Process challenge to the retroactive e...
Decedent, an attorney, in 1925, at the age of sixty-nine, established two spendthrift trusts-one for...
The decedent was a beneficiary of a trust established by his father and of two other trusts created ...
It appears that Heasty v. United States has eliminated the previous uncertain estate tax consequence...
In 1918 decedent established a trust fund in favor of his daughter, reserving the power to alter or ...
In 1919 decedent transferred property in irrevocable trust, income to be paid to X for life and on X...
As is to be expected, many individuals desire to avoid the inclusion of all their property in their ...
After two decades of relative dormancy, we are witnessing a resurgence in state estate tax controver...
The executors of three different estates elected the optional valuation date provided in the federal...
This case presents an issue regarding the constitutionality of retroactive taxes. In December 1987, ...
Section 2036(a) hauls back into a decedent’s gross estate, for federal estate tax purposes, property...
The recent decision by the Supreme Court in United States v. Jacobs deals with the troublesome issue...
An inter vivas trust created by testator and property held jointly with his wife were included in hi...
In 1929 the decedent established a trust, reserving a life estate in the income. On the termination ...
Under Section 811 (e)(2), (g)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by sections 402 and 404 of...
In United States v. Carlton, the Supreme Court rejected a Due Process challenge to the retroactive e...
Decedent, an attorney, in 1925, at the age of sixty-nine, established two spendthrift trusts-one for...
The decedent was a beneficiary of a trust established by his father and of two other trusts created ...
It appears that Heasty v. United States has eliminated the previous uncertain estate tax consequence...
In 1918 decedent established a trust fund in favor of his daughter, reserving the power to alter or ...
In 1919 decedent transferred property in irrevocable trust, income to be paid to X for life and on X...
As is to be expected, many individuals desire to avoid the inclusion of all their property in their ...
After two decades of relative dormancy, we are witnessing a resurgence in state estate tax controver...
The executors of three different estates elected the optional valuation date provided in the federal...
This case presents an issue regarding the constitutionality of retroactive taxes. In December 1987, ...
Section 2036(a) hauls back into a decedent’s gross estate, for federal estate tax purposes, property...