Add to ORKGThe petitioner, suing on behalf of himself and ten thousand other consumers, sought to compel the defendant gas company to furnish gas in accordance with the terms of a rate ordinance. The defendant challenged the petitioner\u27s right to sue, on the ground that statutes had conferred this right upon the city solicitor. Held, the statutes were not intended to abrogate a consumer\u27s common-law right to compel a utility company to perform its public duty. Maxwell v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co., 61 Ohio App. 394, 22 N. E. (2d) 639 (1939)
People like young Montray Cadet and his family will increasingly face the possibility of shut-off an...
This is a review of Supreme Court decisions for the past eight years on the subject of the applicati...
Plaintiff gas company contracted with defendant city to furnish gas from a certain field at rates fi...
The petitioner, suing on behalf of himself and ten thousand other consumers, sought to compel the de...
The plaintiff corporation, a retail distributor of gas, contracted for its supply over a three-year ...
An Oklahoma statute required that the consumer should be charged only for the gas he used as registe...
Since the decision in the case of Munn v. Illinois it has been settled that where property is devot...
This Note will analyze the effects that the Ohio Edison decision will have on the utility industry a...
In Consumers\u27 Coal Co. et al. v. City of Lincoln, et al. (Neb. 1922) 189 N. W. 643, the supreme c...
Present governmental regulation of public utilities can be traced back to early English common law w...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania\u27s connectio...
Defendant, a city engaged in supplying water to its inhabitants, was sued by plaintiff, a consumer, ...
The United States Supreme Court has recently added one moredecision to the long list of cases on the...
The appellee was engaged in the business of selling natural gas. A rival utility entered the field d...
The appellee was engaged in the business of selling natural gas. A rival utility entered the field d...
People like young Montray Cadet and his family will increasingly face the possibility of shut-off an...
This is a review of Supreme Court decisions for the past eight years on the subject of the applicati...
Plaintiff gas company contracted with defendant city to furnish gas from a certain field at rates fi...
The petitioner, suing on behalf of himself and ten thousand other consumers, sought to compel the de...
The plaintiff corporation, a retail distributor of gas, contracted for its supply over a three-year ...
An Oklahoma statute required that the consumer should be charged only for the gas he used as registe...
Since the decision in the case of Munn v. Illinois it has been settled that where property is devot...
This Note will analyze the effects that the Ohio Edison decision will have on the utility industry a...
In Consumers\u27 Coal Co. et al. v. City of Lincoln, et al. (Neb. 1922) 189 N. W. 643, the supreme c...
Present governmental regulation of public utilities can be traced back to early English common law w...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania\u27s connectio...
Defendant, a city engaged in supplying water to its inhabitants, was sued by plaintiff, a consumer, ...
The United States Supreme Court has recently added one moredecision to the long list of cases on the...
The appellee was engaged in the business of selling natural gas. A rival utility entered the field d...
The appellee was engaged in the business of selling natural gas. A rival utility entered the field d...
People like young Montray Cadet and his family will increasingly face the possibility of shut-off an...
This is a review of Supreme Court decisions for the past eight years on the subject of the applicati...
Plaintiff gas company contracted with defendant city to furnish gas from a certain field at rates fi...