Case 1 (100 × 20).

Statistical analysis and comparison of the optimum results obtained by three algorithms.

Rasel Ahmed (6648482)
Shuhaimi Mahadzir (14564555)
Adrián Mota-Babiloni (14564558)
Md Al-Amin (13045659)
Abdullah Yousuf Usmani (14564561)
Zaid Ashraf Rana (14564564)
Hayati Yassin (14564567)
Saboor Shaik (14564570)
Fayaz Hussain (9098234)

February 2023

Statistical analysis and comparison of the optimum results obtained by three algorithms.</p

Performance comparison of algorithms.

Rashad Moqa (14237330)
Irfan Younas (8962544)
Maryam Bashir (14237333)

December 2022

Population size = 100 and Generation = 300. (a) Range, (b) Average Tolerance, (c) Average Hamming Di...

Objective functions (i.e., RMSEs) and time of optimization for different population sizes of the used algorithms.

Yao Peng (1928524)
Yang Chen (9737)

September 2023

Objective functions (i.e., RMSEs) and time of optimization for different population sizes of the use...

Case 3 (100 × 10).

Rutinaldo Aguiar Nascimento (14259594)
Álvaro Barroca Neto (14259597)
Yuri Shalom de Freitas Bezerra (14259600)
Hugo Alexandre Dantas do Nascimento (14259603)
Liacir dos Santos Lucena (14259606)
Joaquim Elias de Freitas (14259609)

December 2022

(a) Comparison between algorithms divided into: Class 1, success rates; Class 2, average CPU times a...

Case 2 (50 × 40).

Rutinaldo Aguiar Nascimento (14259594)
Álvaro Barroca Neto (14259597)
Yuri Shalom de Freitas Bezerra (14259600)
Hugo Alexandre Dantas do Nascimento (14259603)
Liacir dos Santos Lucena (14259606)
Joaquim Elias de Freitas (14259609)

December 2022

(a) Comparison between algorithms divided into: Class 1, success rates; Class 2, average CPU times a...

Case 1 (100 × 20).

Rutinaldo Aguiar Nascimento (14259594)
Álvaro Barroca Neto (14259597)
Yuri Shalom de Freitas Bezerra (14259600)
Hugo Alexandre Dantas do Nascimento (14259603)
Liacir dos Santos Lucena (14259606)
Joaquim Elias de Freitas (14259609)

December 2022

Results of the success rate (sr) and average execution time (rt) of each optimization algorithm.</p

Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classification algorithms.

Jianfang Cao (1881379)
Yanfei Li (3413285)
Yun Tian (411157)

January 2018

Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...

Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers of classification categories.

Jianfang Cao (1881379)
Yanfei Li (3413285)
Yun Tian (411157)

January 2018

Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers...

Comparative statistical performance of various algorithms in minimizing the F cost function.

Davut Izci (15927452)
Serdar Ekinci (15927455)
Abdelazim G. Hussien (15927458)

September 2023

Comparative statistical performance of various algorithms in minimizing the F cost function.</p

Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.

Sajad Mousavi (6672425)
Fatemeh Afghah (6672428)
U. Rajendra Acharya (5909246)

May 2019

Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p

The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.

Ngaam J. Cheung (2220550)
Xue-Ming Ding (2220553)
Hong-Bin Shen (195200)

November 2014

The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.</p

Comparison of performance of individual and combined classifiers.

ManChon U (553999)
Eric Talevich (235366)
Samiksha Katiyar (379207)
Khaled Rasheed (554000)
Natarajan Kannan (41300)

April 2014

Each algorithm trained using selected features and evaluated with 10-fold cross-validation. Value...

The results of for the four compared algorithms.

Yuancheng Li (2082265)
Rixuan Qiu (4892050)
Sitong Jing (4892053)

February 2018

(a) The FNR and FPR Comparison of algorithms. And (b) the Performance Comparison of Algorithms.</...

Performance comparison of recent and effective algorithms for minimizing error-based cost functions.

Davut Izci (15927452)
Serdar Ekinci (15927455)
Abdelazim G. Hussien (15927458)

September 2023

Performance comparison of recent and effective algorithms for minimizing error-based cost functions....

Comparative model performance: Low complexity choices, base rate of comparison: 50%.

Carlos Andres Trujillo (3144393)

November 2018

Comparative model performance: Low complexity choices, base rate of comparison: 50%.</p

Statistical analysis and comparison of the optimum results obtained by three algorithms.

Rasel Ahmed (6648482)
Shuhaimi Mahadzir (14564555)
Adrián Mota-Babiloni (14564558)
Md Al-Amin (13045659)
Abdullah Yousuf Usmani (14564561)
Zaid Ashraf Rana (14564564)
Hayati Yassin (14564567)
Saboor Shaik (14564570)
Fayaz Hussain (9098234)

February 2023

Statistical analysis and comparison of the optimum results obtained by three algorithms.</p

Performance comparison of algorithms.

Rashad Moqa (14237330)
Irfan Younas (8962544)
Maryam Bashir (14237333)

December 2022

Population size = 100 and Generation = 300. (a) Range, (b) Average Tolerance, (c) Average Hamming Di...

Objective functions (i.e., RMSEs) and time of optimization for different population sizes of the used algorithms.

Yao Peng (1928524)
Yang Chen (9737)

September 2023

Objective functions (i.e., RMSEs) and time of optimization for different population sizes of the use...

Case 3 (100 × 10).

Rutinaldo Aguiar Nascimento (14259594)
Álvaro Barroca Neto (14259597)
Yuri Shalom de Freitas Bezerra (14259600)
Hugo Alexandre Dantas do Nascimento (14259603)
Liacir dos Santos Lucena (14259606)
Joaquim Elias de Freitas (14259609)

December 2022

(a) Comparison between algorithms divided into: Class 1, success rates; Class 2, average CPU times a...

Case 2 (50 × 40).

Rutinaldo Aguiar Nascimento (14259594)
Álvaro Barroca Neto (14259597)
Yuri Shalom de Freitas Bezerra (14259600)
Hugo Alexandre Dantas do Nascimento (14259603)
Liacir dos Santos Lucena (14259606)
Joaquim Elias de Freitas (14259609)

December 2022

(a) Comparison between algorithms divided into: Class 1, success rates; Class 2, average CPU times a...

Case 1 (100 × 20).

Rutinaldo Aguiar Nascimento (14259594)
Álvaro Barroca Neto (14259597)
Yuri Shalom de Freitas Bezerra (14259600)
Hugo Alexandre Dantas do Nascimento (14259603)
Liacir dos Santos Lucena (14259606)
Joaquim Elias de Freitas (14259609)

December 2022

Results of the success rate (sr) and average execution time (rt) of each optimization algorithm.</p

Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classification algorithms.

Jianfang Cao (1881379)
Yanfei Li (3413285)
Yun Tian (411157)

January 2018

Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...

Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers of classification categories.

Jianfang Cao (1881379)
Yanfei Li (3413285)
Yun Tian (411157)

January 2018

Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers...

Comparative statistical performance of various algorithms in minimizing the F cost function.

Davut Izci (15927452)
Serdar Ekinci (15927455)
Abdelazim G. Hussien (15927458)

September 2023

Comparative statistical performance of various algorithms in minimizing the F cost function.</p

Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.

Sajad Mousavi (6672425)
Fatemeh Afghah (6672428)
U. Rajendra Acharya (5909246)

May 2019

Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p

The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.

Ngaam J. Cheung (2220550)
Xue-Ming Ding (2220553)
Hong-Bin Shen (195200)

November 2014

The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.</p

Comparison of performance of individual and combined classifiers.

ManChon U (553999)
Eric Talevich (235366)
Samiksha Katiyar (379207)
Khaled Rasheed (554000)
Natarajan Kannan (41300)

April 2014

Each algorithm trained using selected features and evaluated with 10-fold cross-validation. Value...

The results of for the four compared algorithms.

Yuancheng Li (2082265)
Rixuan Qiu (4892050)
Sitong Jing (4892053)

February 2018

(a) The FNR and FPR Comparison of algorithms. And (b) the Performance Comparison of Algorithms.</...

Performance comparison of recent and effective algorithms for minimizing error-based cost functions.

Davut Izci (15927452)
Serdar Ekinci (15927455)
Abdelazim G. Hussien (15927458)

September 2023

Performance comparison of recent and effective algorithms for minimizing error-based cost functions....

Comparative model performance: Low complexity choices, base rate of comparison: 50%.

Carlos Andres Trujillo (3144393)

November 2018

Comparative model performance: Low complexity choices, base rate of comparison: 50%.</p

Statistical analysis and comparison of the optimum results obtained by three algorithms.

Rasel Ahmed (6648482)
Shuhaimi Mahadzir (14564555)
Adrián Mota-Babiloni (14564558)
Md Al-Amin (13045659)
Abdullah Yousuf Usmani (14564561)
Zaid Ashraf Rana (14564564)
Hayati Yassin (14564567)
Saboor Shaik (14564570)
Fayaz Hussain (9098234)

February 2023

Statistical analysis and comparison of the optimum results obtained by three algorithms.</p

Performance comparison of algorithms.

Rashad Moqa (14237330)
Irfan Younas (8962544)
Maryam Bashir (14237333)

December 2022

Population size = 100 and Generation = 300. (a) Range, (b) Average Tolerance, (c) Average Hamming Di...

Objective functions (i.e., RMSEs) and time of optimization for different population sizes of the used algorithms.

Yao Peng (1928524)
Yang Chen (9737)

September 2023

Objective functions (i.e., RMSEs) and time of optimization for different population sizes of the use...

Case 1 (100 × 20).

Abstract

Extracted data

Case 1 (100 × 20).

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items