I introduce and examine an argument presented by American anthropologist Herbert S. Lewis against thinking that British anthropology played a significant role in supporting colonialist projects: the British empire was large and centuries old, so it seems very unlikely that two dozen anthropologists late on made much difference
At first glance, this essay may seem an unlikely contribution to the history of anthropology. Its si...
What are the reasons behind the “scientific” positioning that anthropology had adopted since its ori...
Physical anthropology is quite often presented as one of the favorite and most nefarious tools of co...
I introduce and examine an argument presented by American anthropologist Herbert S. Lewis against th...
As the first government anthropologist to be appointed by the British Colonial Office, Northcote Whi...
British structural-functionalist anthropology was criticized for ignoring colonial relations. What d...
I address the problem that British social anthropologists ignored the wider colonial relations which...
British structural-functionalist anthropology famously faces an objection that it is incapable of de...
Mary Beard argues against the claim that its relationship to British colonialism adequately explains...
This paper responds to Mary Beard’s assessment of the claim that Frazer’s book The Golden Bough was ...
This paper is primarily concerned with the origin and consequence of the so-called “crisis of repres...
In the nineteenth century, there were concerns about the reliability of the amateur sources which ac...
At first glance, this essay may seem an unlikely contribution to the history of anthropology. Its si...
What are the reasons behind the “scientific” positioning that anthropology had adopted since its ori...
Physical anthropology is quite often presented as one of the favorite and most nefarious tools of co...
I introduce and examine an argument presented by American anthropologist Herbert S. Lewis against th...
As the first government anthropologist to be appointed by the British Colonial Office, Northcote Whi...
British structural-functionalist anthropology was criticized for ignoring colonial relations. What d...
I address the problem that British social anthropologists ignored the wider colonial relations which...
British structural-functionalist anthropology famously faces an objection that it is incapable of de...
Mary Beard argues against the claim that its relationship to British colonialism adequately explains...
This paper responds to Mary Beard’s assessment of the claim that Frazer’s book The Golden Bough was ...
This paper is primarily concerned with the origin and consequence of the so-called “crisis of repres...
In the nineteenth century, there were concerns about the reliability of the amateur sources which ac...
At first glance, this essay may seem an unlikely contribution to the history of anthropology. Its si...
What are the reasons behind the “scientific” positioning that anthropology had adopted since its ori...
Physical anthropology is quite often presented as one of the favorite and most nefarious tools of co...