Results are shown both for the mean across all five probe blocks (left) and separately for each probe block. Points reflect individual participants’ behaviour. (A) The sensitivity index d’ increased in probe compared to reinforced trials. (B) The negative bias criterion c decreased on probe blocks, indicating a reduced propensity to act on probe trials. (C), (D) Both hit rate (HR, C) and false alarm rate (FAR, D) decreased on probe blocks, but the decrease in FAR was more pronounced than the decrease in HR, which lead to the increase in d’ represented in (A).</p
(A) Percentage of rejection rates for each offer size across the 60 trials. (B) Visual representatio...
<p>Vocal responses are displayed on a log scale, and probability of travelling and being visible are...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Median reaction times averaged across subjects for each of the 96 target presentations...
<p>‘Hits’: Percentage of correct detections. ‘FA rate’: Percentage of false alarms (indications of c...
<p>A) Force profile (average of 50 trials) of the baseline (dashed lines) and final (solid lines) se...
<p>(a) Empirical RT interference, averaged across participants, represents the RT difference, in ms,...
<p>Analysis of the behavioural data collected during both the behavioural (top three graphs) and fMR...
<p>‘Hits’: Percentage of correct detections. ‘FA rate’: Percentage of false alarms (indications of c...
<p>A. Hit and false alarm rates for discrimination learning. Different experimental runs were aligne...
<p><u>Note:</u> Mean hit rates (H), false alarm rates (FA), discrimination index (Pr) and response b...
There are now a number of experimental studies showing that modification of interpretation biases ca...
<p>Mean response time ± within-subjects s.e.m. for high- and low-reward targets over the course of t...
<p>(A): Average hit rate and false alarm rate across subjects (B): Response time distribution of cor...
Background: Measurement can affect the people being measured; for example, asking people to complete...
Abstract Background There is now clear systematic review evidence that measurement can affect the pe...
(A) Percentage of rejection rates for each offer size across the 60 trials. (B) Visual representatio...
<p>Vocal responses are displayed on a log scale, and probability of travelling and being visible are...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Median reaction times averaged across subjects for each of the 96 target presentations...
<p>‘Hits’: Percentage of correct detections. ‘FA rate’: Percentage of false alarms (indications of c...
<p>A) Force profile (average of 50 trials) of the baseline (dashed lines) and final (solid lines) se...
<p>(a) Empirical RT interference, averaged across participants, represents the RT difference, in ms,...
<p>Analysis of the behavioural data collected during both the behavioural (top three graphs) and fMR...
<p>‘Hits’: Percentage of correct detections. ‘FA rate’: Percentage of false alarms (indications of c...
<p>A. Hit and false alarm rates for discrimination learning. Different experimental runs were aligne...
<p><u>Note:</u> Mean hit rates (H), false alarm rates (FA), discrimination index (Pr) and response b...
There are now a number of experimental studies showing that modification of interpretation biases ca...
<p>Mean response time ± within-subjects s.e.m. for high- and low-reward targets over the course of t...
<p>(A): Average hit rate and false alarm rate across subjects (B): Response time distribution of cor...
Background: Measurement can affect the people being measured; for example, asking people to complete...
Abstract Background There is now clear systematic review evidence that measurement can affect the pe...
(A) Percentage of rejection rates for each offer size across the 60 trials. (B) Visual representatio...
<p>Vocal responses are displayed on a log scale, and probability of travelling and being visible are...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Median reaction times averaged across subjects for each of the 96 target presentations...