The authors argue that their target is orthogonal to the realism and instrumentalist debate. I argue that it is born directly from it. While the distinction is helpful in illuminating how some ontological commitments demand a theory of implementation, it's less clear whether different views cleanly map onto the epistemic and metaphysical uses defined in the paper
Abstract: This paper examines the treatment of ontology offered by Critical Realism. Three main crit...
Hohwy (Hohwy 2016, Hohwy 2017) argues there is a tension between the free energy principle and leadi...
This essay focuses on realism in ontology and on the problem of defining reality. According to the d...
The authors argue that their target is orthogonal to the realism and instrumentalist debate. I argue...
We challenge Bruineberg et al's view that Markov blankets are illicitly reified when used to describ...
Bruineberg and colleagues argue that a realist interpretation of Markov blankets inadvertently relie...
In the paper we argue that no neat border line between ontology and epistemology can be drawn. This ...
'Structural realism' is a buzzword in the scientific realism debate. Various positions with diverse ...
The debate over scientific realism exists in an atmosphere of confusion. Within the literature, argu...
The present paper concerns how scientific realism is formulated and defended. It is argued that van ...
It is widely believed that science is in the business of finding out what the world is really like. ...
Bruineberg and colleagues' critique of Friston blankets relies on what we call the “literalist falla...
Abstract: We target the ontological and epistemological ramifications of the proposed distinction be...
This essay focuses on realism in ontology and on the problem of defining reality. According to the d...
Howhy (Hohwy 2016, Hohwy 2017) argues there is a tension between the free energy principle and leadi...
Abstract: This paper examines the treatment of ontology offered by Critical Realism. Three main crit...
Hohwy (Hohwy 2016, Hohwy 2017) argues there is a tension between the free energy principle and leadi...
This essay focuses on realism in ontology and on the problem of defining reality. According to the d...
The authors argue that their target is orthogonal to the realism and instrumentalist debate. I argue...
We challenge Bruineberg et al's view that Markov blankets are illicitly reified when used to describ...
Bruineberg and colleagues argue that a realist interpretation of Markov blankets inadvertently relie...
In the paper we argue that no neat border line between ontology and epistemology can be drawn. This ...
'Structural realism' is a buzzword in the scientific realism debate. Various positions with diverse ...
The debate over scientific realism exists in an atmosphere of confusion. Within the literature, argu...
The present paper concerns how scientific realism is formulated and defended. It is argued that van ...
It is widely believed that science is in the business of finding out what the world is really like. ...
Bruineberg and colleagues' critique of Friston blankets relies on what we call the “literalist falla...
Abstract: We target the ontological and epistemological ramifications of the proposed distinction be...
This essay focuses on realism in ontology and on the problem of defining reality. According to the d...
Howhy (Hohwy 2016, Hohwy 2017) argues there is a tension between the free energy principle and leadi...
Abstract: This paper examines the treatment of ontology offered by Critical Realism. Three main crit...
Hohwy (Hohwy 2016, Hohwy 2017) argues there is a tension between the free energy principle and leadi...
This essay focuses on realism in ontology and on the problem of defining reality. According to the d...