If one follows the accounts by philosophers of science and the discussions in scientific communities, there can be little doubt that failure is an essential part of scientific practice. It is essential both in the sense of being integral to scientific practice and of being necessary for its overall success. Researchers who create new scientific knowledge face uncertainties about the nature of the problem they are trying to solve, the existence of a solution to that problem, the way in which a solution can be found, and their ability to find such a solution (Gläser, 2007, 247). The existence of these uncertainties means, in turn, that each research process carries the risk of failure
Theoretical arguments and empirical investigations indicate that a high proportion of published find...
Theoretical arguments and empirical investigations indicate that a high proportion of published find...
Scientific epistemology is a topic that has sparked centuries of philosophical discourse. In particu...
If one follows the accounts by philosophers of science and the discussions in scientific communities...
We investigate the explanatory role of epistemic virtue in accounting for the success (or failure) o...
The annals of science are filled with successes. Only in footnotes do we hear about the failures, th...
Wilholt T. Epistemic Trust in Science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2013;64(2)...
Replicability is widely taken to ground the epistemic authority of science. However, in recent years...
Scientific knowledge is the outcome of research and experimentation. How this goal is to be achieved...
No question's solved until error's resolved. —Prospective proverb 1. Introduction. How do ...
Philosophy of science is largely inclined to portray science as a success story. While not in the le...
The accuracy-first program attempts to ground epistemology in the norm that one’s beliefs should be ...
We show a lot of respect for science today. To back up our claims, we tend to appeal to scientific m...
Philosophy of science and mainstream epistemology have much to leam from each other. Most twentienth...
Theoretical arguments and empirical investigations indicate that a high proportion of published find...
Theoretical arguments and empirical investigations indicate that a high proportion of published find...
Scientific epistemology is a topic that has sparked centuries of philosophical discourse. In particu...
If one follows the accounts by philosophers of science and the discussions in scientific communities...
We investigate the explanatory role of epistemic virtue in accounting for the success (or failure) o...
The annals of science are filled with successes. Only in footnotes do we hear about the failures, th...
Wilholt T. Epistemic Trust in Science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2013;64(2)...
Replicability is widely taken to ground the epistemic authority of science. However, in recent years...
Scientific knowledge is the outcome of research and experimentation. How this goal is to be achieved...
No question's solved until error's resolved. —Prospective proverb 1. Introduction. How do ...
Philosophy of science is largely inclined to portray science as a success story. While not in the le...
The accuracy-first program attempts to ground epistemology in the norm that one’s beliefs should be ...
We show a lot of respect for science today. To back up our claims, we tend to appeal to scientific m...
Philosophy of science and mainstream epistemology have much to leam from each other. Most twentienth...
Theoretical arguments and empirical investigations indicate that a high proportion of published find...
Theoretical arguments and empirical investigations indicate that a high proportion of published find...
Scientific epistemology is a topic that has sparked centuries of philosophical discourse. In particu...