Defendant contractor was engaged by the city of Duluth to do sewer construction work contemplating excavation in solid rock with heavy charges of explosives. The contract made defendant liable for any damage done to private property and injuries sustained by persons in the course of its work. Plaintiff\u27s nearby land was damaged by defendant\u27s blasting operations. Held, that plaintiff, a mere donee beneficiary, was entitled to recover, although he was not a party to the contract, had furnished no consideration, and was not identified at the time the contract was made. La Mourea v. Rhude, (Minn. 1940) 295 N. W. 304
Stanfield recovered judgment against W. C. McBride, Inc. for personal injuries suffered in an automo...
If the modern theory of consideration is that it is compensation in the form of either a promise, or...
Defendant had a right of way over plaintiff\u27s land limited to the transportation of coal mined on...
Defendant contractor was engaged by the city of Duluth to do sewer construction work contemplating e...
Plaintiff contracted to excavate a cellar for a stated price. He encountered solid rock and complete...
ln a recent federal case, plaintiff construction company contracted to enlarge a dam for defendants,...
The defendant purchased a barber shop and beauty parlor business from the plaintiff; and as part of ...
Plaintiff, a real estate broker, was employed by defendant under a contract to negotiate the purchas...
A and B contract, A promising B to render at a future date some performance to C. What are the legal...
Defendant leased trucks to plaintiff\u27s employer for road construction purposes, contracting to ke...
Plaintiff furnished labor and materials for repairs to a farm house owned by defendant. The work was...
Two parties, A and B, make a contract whereby B undertakes to perform certain services for A. He per...
Having interested plaintiff in certain debentures, defendant, in return for a promise of one-fourth ...
Petitioner suffered injuries in the course of his duties as an employee of respondent railroad. Subs...
The question of damage measures presented by the conscious decision of a promisor to breach a losing...
Stanfield recovered judgment against W. C. McBride, Inc. for personal injuries suffered in an automo...
If the modern theory of consideration is that it is compensation in the form of either a promise, or...
Defendant had a right of way over plaintiff\u27s land limited to the transportation of coal mined on...
Defendant contractor was engaged by the city of Duluth to do sewer construction work contemplating e...
Plaintiff contracted to excavate a cellar for a stated price. He encountered solid rock and complete...
ln a recent federal case, plaintiff construction company contracted to enlarge a dam for defendants,...
The defendant purchased a barber shop and beauty parlor business from the plaintiff; and as part of ...
Plaintiff, a real estate broker, was employed by defendant under a contract to negotiate the purchas...
A and B contract, A promising B to render at a future date some performance to C. What are the legal...
Defendant leased trucks to plaintiff\u27s employer for road construction purposes, contracting to ke...
Plaintiff furnished labor and materials for repairs to a farm house owned by defendant. The work was...
Two parties, A and B, make a contract whereby B undertakes to perform certain services for A. He per...
Having interested plaintiff in certain debentures, defendant, in return for a promise of one-fourth ...
Petitioner suffered injuries in the course of his duties as an employee of respondent railroad. Subs...
The question of damage measures presented by the conscious decision of a promisor to breach a losing...
Stanfield recovered judgment against W. C. McBride, Inc. for personal injuries suffered in an automo...
If the modern theory of consideration is that it is compensation in the form of either a promise, or...
Defendant had a right of way over plaintiff\u27s land limited to the transportation of coal mined on...