Add to ORKGIt is the purpose of this comment to examine the contract and the property theories of restrictive covenants; and to suggest other possible grounds upon which to decide whether or not a public agency should compensate owners in the subdivision for interference with their restrictive covenants
Certain farm owners, intending to subdivide the land, conveyed a lot to plaintiff by a deed restrict...
The purpose of the requirement of just compensation contained in the United States Constitution, whe...
Constitutional Law/Property-RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS: DO THEY APPLY TO PUBLIC BODIES
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the contract and the property theories of restrictive c...
In eminent domain proceedings where the state or a repository of state power seeks to use land withi...
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the legal consequences produced when the tranquility of...
Under the District of Columbia Redevelopment Act, an agency was created to redevelop blighted and sl...
Excepting a small area set aside for business purposes, the deeds conveying more than 1300 lots in t...
Though no logical limits are evident in the cases, it nonetheless remains to be seen how far courts ...
Defendant city instituted a comprehensive urban redevelopment plan under which condemnation and purc...
Many years ago a subdivision in Detroit was platted, with recorded building restrictions. When ready...
The restrictive covenant is a device by which property owners can gain some degree of assurance that...
The Wandermere Corporation owned one mile of frontage along an open-access highway. The state planne...
The eminent domain clause of the U.S. Constitution concerns the limits of the government\u27s right ...
Eminent domain has evolved to encourage almost every conceivable type of economic development. In re...
Certain farm owners, intending to subdivide the land, conveyed a lot to plaintiff by a deed restrict...
The purpose of the requirement of just compensation contained in the United States Constitution, whe...
Constitutional Law/Property-RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS: DO THEY APPLY TO PUBLIC BODIES
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the contract and the property theories of restrictive c...
In eminent domain proceedings where the state or a repository of state power seeks to use land withi...
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the legal consequences produced when the tranquility of...
Under the District of Columbia Redevelopment Act, an agency was created to redevelop blighted and sl...
Excepting a small area set aside for business purposes, the deeds conveying more than 1300 lots in t...
Though no logical limits are evident in the cases, it nonetheless remains to be seen how far courts ...
Defendant city instituted a comprehensive urban redevelopment plan under which condemnation and purc...
Many years ago a subdivision in Detroit was platted, with recorded building restrictions. When ready...
The restrictive covenant is a device by which property owners can gain some degree of assurance that...
The Wandermere Corporation owned one mile of frontage along an open-access highway. The state planne...
The eminent domain clause of the U.S. Constitution concerns the limits of the government\u27s right ...
Eminent domain has evolved to encourage almost every conceivable type of economic development. In re...
Certain farm owners, intending to subdivide the land, conveyed a lot to plaintiff by a deed restrict...
The purpose of the requirement of just compensation contained in the United States Constitution, whe...
Constitutional Law/Property-RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS: DO THEY APPLY TO PUBLIC BODIES