Plaintiff operated an airport which was adjacent to defendant public utility\u27s uninsulated electric power transmission line. Since the airplane could not enter or leave the airport without flying low over defendant\u27s adjacent right-of-way, the wire constituted an obstruction to their means of ingress and egress; in addition there was the danger of electrocution from contact with the wires. Plaintiff contends that this constitutes an interference with his business and seeks damages. Held, for defendant; under the statute plaintiff is a trespasser because he interferes with the reasonable use of defendant\u27s property and a landowner is under no obligation to keep the premises safe for a trespasser. Capital Airways, Inc. v. Indianapoli...
Plaintiffs, homeowners living near Santa Monica Municipal Airport, brought suit against the municipa...
Plaintiff suffered injuries, due to the faulty insulation of defendant\u27s transformer, while using...
Professor McGee comments on whether tenants have rights to the airspace that extends beyond the exte...
Plaintiff operated an airport which was adjacent to defendant public utility\u27s uninsulated electr...
The tort of trespass to land has proven to be controversial as applied to airplane overflights (and ...
Plaintiff owned land adjacent to the Greater Pittsburgh Airport which lay under an approach area for...
The airspace above land is the object of at least five conflicting claims of right. The owner of the...
Defendant left on his land tractors which could easily be started by children in the neighborhood wh...
Plaintiff, passenger in an airplane owned by defendant as proprietor of the flight school and pilote...
Plaintiffs, owners of property lying under the flight path of planes using the airport owned and ope...
We all recognize that flight over private property must in some way be legalized. If the courts were...
Covers cases on constitutional takings and constitutional damaging—wrongful activity by municipal co...
Plaintiff held a reconfirmed tourist reservation on one of defendant\u27s St. Louis-to-Los Angeles f...
The article discusses Walton Family Estates Ltd v GJD Services Ltd [2021] EWHC 88 (Comm) clarifying ...
We are witnessing an explosion in the construction of wind turbine generators, cell phone towers, an...
Plaintiffs, homeowners living near Santa Monica Municipal Airport, brought suit against the municipa...
Plaintiff suffered injuries, due to the faulty insulation of defendant\u27s transformer, while using...
Professor McGee comments on whether tenants have rights to the airspace that extends beyond the exte...
Plaintiff operated an airport which was adjacent to defendant public utility\u27s uninsulated electr...
The tort of trespass to land has proven to be controversial as applied to airplane overflights (and ...
Plaintiff owned land adjacent to the Greater Pittsburgh Airport which lay under an approach area for...
The airspace above land is the object of at least five conflicting claims of right. The owner of the...
Defendant left on his land tractors which could easily be started by children in the neighborhood wh...
Plaintiff, passenger in an airplane owned by defendant as proprietor of the flight school and pilote...
Plaintiffs, owners of property lying under the flight path of planes using the airport owned and ope...
We all recognize that flight over private property must in some way be legalized. If the courts were...
Covers cases on constitutional takings and constitutional damaging—wrongful activity by municipal co...
Plaintiff held a reconfirmed tourist reservation on one of defendant\u27s St. Louis-to-Los Angeles f...
The article discusses Walton Family Estates Ltd v GJD Services Ltd [2021] EWHC 88 (Comm) clarifying ...
We are witnessing an explosion in the construction of wind turbine generators, cell phone towers, an...
Plaintiffs, homeowners living near Santa Monica Municipal Airport, brought suit against the municipa...
Plaintiff suffered injuries, due to the faulty insulation of defendant\u27s transformer, while using...
Professor McGee comments on whether tenants have rights to the airspace that extends beyond the exte...