An economic expert working group (STECF/SGBRE-07-05) was convened in 2007 for evaluating the potential economic consequences of a Long-Term Management Plan for the northern hake. Analyzing all the scenarios proposed by biological assessment, they found that keeping the F in the status quo level was the best policy in terms of net present values for both yield and profits. This result is counter intuitive because it may indicate that effort costs do no affect the economic reference points. However, it is well accepted that the inclusion of costs affects negatively the economic reference points. In this paper, applying a dynamic agestructured model to the northern hake, we show that the optimal fishing mortality that maximizes the net present...
Research MastersIn this study we apply an age-structured bio-economic model to the Ibero-Atlantic s...
International fisheries agencies recommend exploitation paths that satisfy two features. First, for ...
Working Document No. 10 to the Arctic Fisheries Working Group, 19 – 28 April 2006The Norwegian Direc...
Most fisheries agencies conduct biological and economic assessments independently. This independent ...
We evaluate the management of the Northern Stock of Hake during 1986-2001. A stochastic bioeconomic...
International fisheries agencies recommend exploitation paths that satisfy two features. First, for ...
What would have happened if a relatively looser fisheries policy had been implemented in the Europea...
The evaluation of multi-annual plans to manage demersal fisheries performed by STECF (2016) is revis...
Subsidies to the fishing sector have long been criticized for fueling over-fishing, and a reduction ...
The purpose of this article is to characterize dynamic optimal harvesting trajectories that maximize...
This deliverable presents the results of the bio-economic modelling assessments carried out under ta...
To assess the likely economic outcomes to fishing fleets of the Landing Obligation (LO), bioeconomic...
The Multiannual Management Plan embedded in Regulation EU 2019/1022 of the European Parliament and o...
This thesis presents the results of the performance of marine fisheries in various European Union (E...
An approach known as management strategy evaluation (MSE) provides a framework for identifying robus...
Research MastersIn this study we apply an age-structured bio-economic model to the Ibero-Atlantic s...
International fisheries agencies recommend exploitation paths that satisfy two features. First, for ...
Working Document No. 10 to the Arctic Fisheries Working Group, 19 – 28 April 2006The Norwegian Direc...
Most fisheries agencies conduct biological and economic assessments independently. This independent ...
We evaluate the management of the Northern Stock of Hake during 1986-2001. A stochastic bioeconomic...
International fisheries agencies recommend exploitation paths that satisfy two features. First, for ...
What would have happened if a relatively looser fisheries policy had been implemented in the Europea...
The evaluation of multi-annual plans to manage demersal fisheries performed by STECF (2016) is revis...
Subsidies to the fishing sector have long been criticized for fueling over-fishing, and a reduction ...
The purpose of this article is to characterize dynamic optimal harvesting trajectories that maximize...
This deliverable presents the results of the bio-economic modelling assessments carried out under ta...
To assess the likely economic outcomes to fishing fleets of the Landing Obligation (LO), bioeconomic...
The Multiannual Management Plan embedded in Regulation EU 2019/1022 of the European Parliament and o...
This thesis presents the results of the performance of marine fisheries in various European Union (E...
An approach known as management strategy evaluation (MSE) provides a framework for identifying robus...
Research MastersIn this study we apply an age-structured bio-economic model to the Ibero-Atlantic s...
International fisheries agencies recommend exploitation paths that satisfy two features. First, for ...
Working Document No. 10 to the Arctic Fisheries Working Group, 19 – 28 April 2006The Norwegian Direc...