Industrial history shows us how firms have always been unequally distributed geographically. In all industrial periods, firms have been sensitive to specific factors that have favoured one location instead of another. The aggregate result of single firm localisation choices is that, if firms are attracted by similar factors that can be found in one location and not in another, they will tend to cluster in those specific geographic areas. The focus of this chapter is to study the reasons for clustering in the relatively new high-technology sectors, including biotechnology
This research, conducted via interviews at 32 biotechnology firms, which provide rare information on...
This research, conducted via interviews at 32 biotechnology firms, which provide rare information on...
Since its origin, biotechnology has developed in few centres of excellence identifiable as biotech c...
none2siIndustrial history shows us how firms have always been unequally distributed geographically. ...
One of the most commonly observed features of the organization of markets is that similar business e...
Since the 1980s there has emerged a new stream of international sociological research concerned with...
Why do biotech firms cluster? New and established firms in biotech clusters are said to capitalize o...
Why do biotech firms cluster? New and established firms in biotech clusters are said to capitalize o...
The extensive literature on geographical clusters has argued that firms stand to gain from the knowl...
This study empirically tests Pouder & St. John\u27s propositions (1996) on the evolutions of geograp...
This paper investigates whether firms active in biotechnology can improve their technological perfor...
An empirical study of scientific communication among biotechnology companies supports the belief tha...
The biotechnology industry has developed in a number of tight spatial clusters in the US and in othe...
Based on a survey of the French Biotech SMEs (see annex 1), this article examines localisation effec...
Based on a survey of the French Biotech SMEs (see annex 1), this article examines localisation effec...
This research, conducted via interviews at 32 biotechnology firms, which provide rare information on...
This research, conducted via interviews at 32 biotechnology firms, which provide rare information on...
Since its origin, biotechnology has developed in few centres of excellence identifiable as biotech c...
none2siIndustrial history shows us how firms have always been unequally distributed geographically. ...
One of the most commonly observed features of the organization of markets is that similar business e...
Since the 1980s there has emerged a new stream of international sociological research concerned with...
Why do biotech firms cluster? New and established firms in biotech clusters are said to capitalize o...
Why do biotech firms cluster? New and established firms in biotech clusters are said to capitalize o...
The extensive literature on geographical clusters has argued that firms stand to gain from the knowl...
This study empirically tests Pouder & St. John\u27s propositions (1996) on the evolutions of geograp...
This paper investigates whether firms active in biotechnology can improve their technological perfor...
An empirical study of scientific communication among biotechnology companies supports the belief tha...
The biotechnology industry has developed in a number of tight spatial clusters in the US and in othe...
Based on a survey of the French Biotech SMEs (see annex 1), this article examines localisation effec...
Based on a survey of the French Biotech SMEs (see annex 1), this article examines localisation effec...
This research, conducted via interviews at 32 biotechnology firms, which provide rare information on...
This research, conducted via interviews at 32 biotechnology firms, which provide rare information on...
Since its origin, biotechnology has developed in few centres of excellence identifiable as biotech c...