The article analyses the jurisprudence of the Swiss Supreme Court related to the appeals against the awards issued by international arbitral tribunals of the Court of Arbitration for Sport seated in Lausanne. In particular, the analysis focuses on the five different grounds for annulment provided by Swiss private international law: 1) irregular constitution of the arbitral tribunal, 2) jurisdiction wrongly retained or declined, 3) adjudication ultra, extra or infra petita, 4) violation of due process, and 5) violation of public policy
Comment to the decision 4A_488/2011 (18.06.2012) of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court
The Swiss Federal Tribunal has recently rendered three decisions addressing the issue of res judicat...
Different interpretations of the New York Convention’s Article V(1)(e) have caused inconsistencies r...
The article examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), dealing first with its history and it...
L' articolo prende in esame la giurisprudenza del Tribunale federale svizzero (vale a dire, la supre...
This essay examines international sports arbitration, focusing in particular on the Court of Arbitra...
Comment on the decision 4A_538/2012 (17.01.2013) of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court
This article provides an overview of the nature and scope of judicial review of Olympic and internat...
The author examines whether and by which means the decisions handed down by the State judge giving h...
Comparative law solutions encourage resolving disputes in the area of sport through arbitration, and...
Historically, Geneva has proved an attractive site for international commercial arbitration. Today, ...
Comment on the decisions 4A_256/2009 and 4A_258/2009 (11.01.2010) of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court
Sports arbitration, as any other arbitration, is based on the arbitration agreement. Arbitration agr...
This essay on applicable law in CAS arbitration proceedings, written in Spanish, deals with the priv...
This article investigates processual and legal aspects, which concern the possibility of contestatio...
Comment to the decision 4A_488/2011 (18.06.2012) of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court
The Swiss Federal Tribunal has recently rendered three decisions addressing the issue of res judicat...
Different interpretations of the New York Convention’s Article V(1)(e) have caused inconsistencies r...
The article examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), dealing first with its history and it...
L' articolo prende in esame la giurisprudenza del Tribunale federale svizzero (vale a dire, la supre...
This essay examines international sports arbitration, focusing in particular on the Court of Arbitra...
Comment on the decision 4A_538/2012 (17.01.2013) of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court
This article provides an overview of the nature and scope of judicial review of Olympic and internat...
The author examines whether and by which means the decisions handed down by the State judge giving h...
Comparative law solutions encourage resolving disputes in the area of sport through arbitration, and...
Historically, Geneva has proved an attractive site for international commercial arbitration. Today, ...
Comment on the decisions 4A_256/2009 and 4A_258/2009 (11.01.2010) of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court
Sports arbitration, as any other arbitration, is based on the arbitration agreement. Arbitration agr...
This essay on applicable law in CAS arbitration proceedings, written in Spanish, deals with the priv...
This article investigates processual and legal aspects, which concern the possibility of contestatio...
Comment to the decision 4A_488/2011 (18.06.2012) of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court
The Swiss Federal Tribunal has recently rendered three decisions addressing the issue of res judicat...
Different interpretations of the New York Convention’s Article V(1)(e) have caused inconsistencies r...