This book offers a unique comparison between state and individual responsibility for international crimes and examines the theories that can explain the relationship between these two regimes. The study provides a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the relevant international practice from the standpoint of both international criminal law, and in particular the case law of international criminal tribunals, and state responsibility. The author shows the various connections and issues arising from the parallel establishment of state and individual responsibility for the commission of the same international crimes. These connections indicate a growing need to better co-ordinate these regimes of international responsibility. The author ma...
The concept of criminal responsibility of a state is addressed on the basis of the international dev...
This thesis begins with the observation that a gap exists between the universal consensus among all ...
International criminal law lacks a coherent theory of perpetration for international crimes. Courts ...
This book offers a unique comparison between state and individual responsibility for international c...
While it is settled principle that states incur international responsibility when they commit intern...
This book focuses on the concept of state responsibility for international crimes. Part I consists o...
This book examines the concept of individual criminal responsibility for serious violations of inter...
The existence of dual system of responsibility is considered to be a constant feature of internation...
Duality of responsibility in international law arises when the same conduct entails the internationa...
The international law of state responsibility determines when states are liable for international la...
The denotations of two concepts that are most widely known in the doctrine of the international law ...
The international law of state responsibility determines when states are liable for international la...
International crimes are committed by individuals, but many – from genocide in Rwanda to torture at ...
Under established principles of international law, State responsibility only arises where armed grou...
This chapter is concerned with the shift in international political and legal discourse away from as...
The concept of criminal responsibility of a state is addressed on the basis of the international dev...
This thesis begins with the observation that a gap exists between the universal consensus among all ...
International criminal law lacks a coherent theory of perpetration for international crimes. Courts ...
This book offers a unique comparison between state and individual responsibility for international c...
While it is settled principle that states incur international responsibility when they commit intern...
This book focuses on the concept of state responsibility for international crimes. Part I consists o...
This book examines the concept of individual criminal responsibility for serious violations of inter...
The existence of dual system of responsibility is considered to be a constant feature of internation...
Duality of responsibility in international law arises when the same conduct entails the internationa...
The international law of state responsibility determines when states are liable for international la...
The denotations of two concepts that are most widely known in the doctrine of the international law ...
The international law of state responsibility determines when states are liable for international la...
International crimes are committed by individuals, but many – from genocide in Rwanda to torture at ...
Under established principles of international law, State responsibility only arises where armed grou...
This chapter is concerned with the shift in international political and legal discourse away from as...
The concept of criminal responsibility of a state is addressed on the basis of the international dev...
This thesis begins with the observation that a gap exists between the universal consensus among all ...
International criminal law lacks a coherent theory of perpetration for international crimes. Courts ...