The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the parameter m that increases discretely from 10 to 90 in steps of 10. (TIF)</p
<p>The performance of the method (Y axis), measured as the percentage of protein structures in which...
<p>The comparison of GA-DCT with other biclustering algorithms in case of protein complex detection ...
<p>(A–C) Coverage of protein-protein interfaces and Accuracy of predicted motifs. Each dot represent...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
Performance comparison on the Protein dataset in terms of GED (lower is better) as a function of the...
Performance comparison on the Protein dataset in terms of GED (lower is better) as a function of the...
Comparison of SCGG with its competitors for m = 10 in terms of GED (Avg. ± Std.).</p
Performance comparison on the Enzymes dataset in terms of GED (lower is better) as a function of the...
<p>Only proteins for which both the Evolutionary Trace and ConSurf methods are able to give predicti...
<p>In both plots, <i>x</i>-axes are the number (<i>r</i>) of top-ranked protein pairs (ranked by the...
<p>The performance of the method (Y axis), measured as the percentage of protein structures in which...
<p>The comparison of GA-DCT with other biclustering algorithms in case of protein complex detection ...
<p>(A–C) Coverage of protein-protein interfaces and Accuracy of predicted motifs. Each dot represent...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
The results are reported in terms of GED (the lower the better) as a function of the number of new n...
Performance comparison on the Protein dataset in terms of GED (lower is better) as a function of the...
Performance comparison on the Protein dataset in terms of GED (lower is better) as a function of the...
Comparison of SCGG with its competitors for m = 10 in terms of GED (Avg. ± Std.).</p
Performance comparison on the Enzymes dataset in terms of GED (lower is better) as a function of the...
<p>Only proteins for which both the Evolutionary Trace and ConSurf methods are able to give predicti...
<p>In both plots, <i>x</i>-axes are the number (<i>r</i>) of top-ranked protein pairs (ranked by the...
<p>The performance of the method (Y axis), measured as the percentage of protein structures in which...
<p>The comparison of GA-DCT with other biclustering algorithms in case of protein complex detection ...
<p>(A–C) Coverage of protein-protein interfaces and Accuracy of predicted motifs. Each dot represent...
DOI
Add to ORKG