Cognitive science meets the mark of the cognitive: Putting the horse before the cart

Among those living systems, which are cognizers? Among the behaviours of, and causes of behaviour in, living systems, which are cognitive? Such questions sit at the heart of a sophisticated, ongoing debate, of which the recent papers by Corcoran, Pezzulo, and Hohwy (2020) and Sims and Kiverstein (2021) serve as excellent examples. I argue that despite their virtues, both papers suffer from flawed conceptions of the point of the debate. This leaves their proposals ill-motivated — good answers to the wrong question. Additionally, their proposals are unfit to serve the legitimate roles for characterizations of cognition