The opinion of the CJEU Attorney General on mass data retention has been long awaited by anyone interested in privacy rights, and more generally the relationship between states and their citizens during this period of an extended “war on terror”. While some civil rights groups have already claimed victory, on closer look the opinion of the AG is not an unmitigated success for privacy activists: It gives considerable discretion to member states to enact data retention provisions providing they meet the Digital Rights Ireland standard.</p
Since the US National Security Agency’s former contractor Edward Snowden exposed the Agency’s mass s...
The CJEU declared the Data Retention Directive to be invalid by judgment of 8 April 2014. According ...
The idea of data retention measures in the EU law is not a new one, but the adoption and implementat...
Recent technological developments have brought into question the protection of personal data and ind...
Directive 2006/24/EC sets out data retention rules and is a useful tool for the investigation, detec...
The growth of data retention in Europe has been marked by an interplay between national laws and Eur...
The chapter explores the fate of the Data Retention Directive, the Digital Rights Ireland case and i...
Metadata retention based on the modern technology capabilities is proven to be an effective tool for...
In Digital Rights Ireland, the Court of Justice invalidated the 2006 Data Retention Directive, which...
In a high profile decision delivered in April 2014, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the...
On July, 19, Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe gave his Opinion in the Tele2 case. The CJEU is aske...
In 1995, the European Union adopted the Data Protection Directive to govern the processing, use, and...
The EU Electronic Privacy Directive of 2002 requires members to ensure the confidentiality of commun...
This analysis examines the challenging balance between the rights to privacy and data protection, on...
Among the wide variety of national and multinational legal regimes for protecting privacy, two domin...
Since the US National Security Agency’s former contractor Edward Snowden exposed the Agency’s mass s...
The CJEU declared the Data Retention Directive to be invalid by judgment of 8 April 2014. According ...
The idea of data retention measures in the EU law is not a new one, but the adoption and implementat...
Recent technological developments have brought into question the protection of personal data and ind...
Directive 2006/24/EC sets out data retention rules and is a useful tool for the investigation, detec...
The growth of data retention in Europe has been marked by an interplay between national laws and Eur...
The chapter explores the fate of the Data Retention Directive, the Digital Rights Ireland case and i...
Metadata retention based on the modern technology capabilities is proven to be an effective tool for...
In Digital Rights Ireland, the Court of Justice invalidated the 2006 Data Retention Directive, which...
In a high profile decision delivered in April 2014, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the...
On July, 19, Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe gave his Opinion in the Tele2 case. The CJEU is aske...
In 1995, the European Union adopted the Data Protection Directive to govern the processing, use, and...
The EU Electronic Privacy Directive of 2002 requires members to ensure the confidentiality of commun...
This analysis examines the challenging balance between the rights to privacy and data protection, on...
Among the wide variety of national and multinational legal regimes for protecting privacy, two domin...
Since the US National Security Agency’s former contractor Edward Snowden exposed the Agency’s mass s...
The CJEU declared the Data Retention Directive to be invalid by judgment of 8 April 2014. According ...
The idea of data retention measures in the EU law is not a new one, but the adoption and implementat...