Add to ORKGOn 20 June, the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, with three anti-judges among its members, decided that certain provisions of the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary of Poland were unconstitutional. By doing so, the Tribunal unanimously conceded to the motion of the Minister of Justice, who had questioned those provisions in the course of work on reform of the National Council of the Judiciary. The reason why the current Polish Government unexpectedly suspended the process of usurping control of the national judicial system in order to enlist the help of the constitutional court can be understood with the help of a metaphor.</p
In Poland, from the start of the democratic transformation in 1989, the rule of law became a fundame...
Towards the end of January 2017, the Polish Ministry of Justice introduced a bill reforming the curr...
The establishment of Polish courts in 1917, which took place even before Poland regained independenc...
On 20 June, the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, with three anti-judges among its members, decided th...
Immediately after the governing Law and Justice party in Poland established its control over the Con...
A constitutional crisis? A coup d’état? Whatever it is Poland is going through right now, the consti...
With political appointments to its National Council of the Judiciary, Poland is now seeing the next ...
What to do with the façade institution that was once known as the Polish Constitutional Court in a w...
Recent years have gone down in the history of the Polish constitutional thought with an unprecedente...
One of the three powers in the division of State authority is the judiciary. Its competences may not...
On 11 of August 2016 the Polish Constitutional Tribunal (“Tribunal”) decided case K 39/16 in which i...
he author of the position of the Sejm on the application of the President of the Council of Minister...
After the unconstitutional capture of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland, ordinary courts will ha...
This paper is devoted to the Act of June 9, 2022 amending the Act on the Supreme Court and certain o...
On 9th March ‒ just two days before the Venice Commission adopted its opinion on the same matter ‒ t...
In Poland, from the start of the democratic transformation in 1989, the rule of law became a fundame...
Towards the end of January 2017, the Polish Ministry of Justice introduced a bill reforming the curr...
The establishment of Polish courts in 1917, which took place even before Poland regained independenc...
On 20 June, the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, with three anti-judges among its members, decided th...
Immediately after the governing Law and Justice party in Poland established its control over the Con...
A constitutional crisis? A coup d’état? Whatever it is Poland is going through right now, the consti...
With political appointments to its National Council of the Judiciary, Poland is now seeing the next ...
What to do with the façade institution that was once known as the Polish Constitutional Court in a w...
Recent years have gone down in the history of the Polish constitutional thought with an unprecedente...
One of the three powers in the division of State authority is the judiciary. Its competences may not...
On 11 of August 2016 the Polish Constitutional Tribunal (“Tribunal”) decided case K 39/16 in which i...
he author of the position of the Sejm on the application of the President of the Council of Minister...
After the unconstitutional capture of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland, ordinary courts will ha...
This paper is devoted to the Act of June 9, 2022 amending the Act on the Supreme Court and certain o...
On 9th March ‒ just two days before the Venice Commission adopted its opinion on the same matter ‒ t...
In Poland, from the start of the democratic transformation in 1989, the rule of law became a fundame...
Towards the end of January 2017, the Polish Ministry of Justice introduced a bill reforming the curr...
The establishment of Polish courts in 1917, which took place even before Poland regained independenc...