On 11 January 2018, Turkish constitutionalism entered a new phase of decay. This phase was not triggered by criticism of its judgments by the government nor by the retreat of constitutional protections by the Turkish Constitutional Court (TCC) nor by constitutional court packing as seen in Hungary or Poland. Instead, first instance courts became the newest actors to challenge the authority of the country’s constitution and how it is interpreted by the TCC. The new rebels against Turkish constitutionalism are ordinary judges.</p
Senem Aydın Düzgit, CEPS Associate Research Fellow, finds in this Commentary that the current politi...
On 16 April the citizens of Turkey voted in a national referendum to amend the constitution. This wi...
In this policy brief, Dr Bill Kissane of LSE examines the Turkish referendum on the most ambitious c...
The Turkish Constitutional Courts verdict annulling the Parliaments amendments to Articles 10 and 42...
Last week, the Turkish Constitutional Court delivered two decisions on the constitutional complaints...
Authoritarian regimes create and empower courts in anticipation of various regime-supporting functio...
In the last month of 2016, Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the fourth bigges...
In the last twenty years, the making of constitutions has gained considerable momentum in countries ...
Today’s new authoritarian regimes are distinguished by their use of legality in authoritarian consol...
This article traces the evolution of judicial self-government practices (JSG) in Turkey and argues t...
On November 8th, the 3rd Criminal Chamber of Turkey's Court of Cassation, the nation's apex court fo...
The Constitutional referendum held 16.04. 2017. has brought many changes in the constitutional regul...
After over nine months of preparatory meetings, the Turkish opposition coalition consisting of six p...
A wise man once said: ‘Just when you think things cannot get any worse, they will.’ The year 2019 wa...
Although Turkey has largely maintained the constitutional tradition inherited from the Ottomans, and...
Senem Aydın Düzgit, CEPS Associate Research Fellow, finds in this Commentary that the current politi...
On 16 April the citizens of Turkey voted in a national referendum to amend the constitution. This wi...
In this policy brief, Dr Bill Kissane of LSE examines the Turkish referendum on the most ambitious c...
The Turkish Constitutional Courts verdict annulling the Parliaments amendments to Articles 10 and 42...
Last week, the Turkish Constitutional Court delivered two decisions on the constitutional complaints...
Authoritarian regimes create and empower courts in anticipation of various regime-supporting functio...
In the last month of 2016, Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the fourth bigges...
In the last twenty years, the making of constitutions has gained considerable momentum in countries ...
Today’s new authoritarian regimes are distinguished by their use of legality in authoritarian consol...
This article traces the evolution of judicial self-government practices (JSG) in Turkey and argues t...
On November 8th, the 3rd Criminal Chamber of Turkey's Court of Cassation, the nation's apex court fo...
The Constitutional referendum held 16.04. 2017. has brought many changes in the constitutional regul...
After over nine months of preparatory meetings, the Turkish opposition coalition consisting of six p...
A wise man once said: ‘Just when you think things cannot get any worse, they will.’ The year 2019 wa...
Although Turkey has largely maintained the constitutional tradition inherited from the Ottomans, and...
Senem Aydın Düzgit, CEPS Associate Research Fellow, finds in this Commentary that the current politi...
On 16 April the citizens of Turkey voted in a national referendum to amend the constitution. This wi...
In this policy brief, Dr Bill Kissane of LSE examines the Turkish referendum on the most ambitious c...