On 26 June 2018, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held its hearing in Opinion 1/17, which concerns the compatibility of CETA’s Investment Court System (ICS) with EU law. Due to the depth of the substantive issues covered and the length of hearing, this post only addresses the first of four questions posed to the ECJ by Belgium, which relates to the principle of autonomy. It is fair to say though that autonomy-related questions and arguments featured the hearing most prominently and may therefore be particularly contentious.</p
This article endeavours to assess whether the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (‘ISDS’) mechanism e...
International audienceLike a tightrope walker, the Court is engaging in a delicate balancing actin i...
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(1), 757-777 | Articl...
In April 2019, the Court of Justice of the EU (‘CJEU’) handed down its Opinion (C-1/17) on the compa...
Criticism of the system of Investor-State dispute settlement has led to an attempt to reform the sys...
In the Achmea case (judgment of 6 March 2018, case C-284/16), the Court of Justice applied its stand...
By its landmark ruling on 6 March 2018 in the Achmea case, the European Court of Justice considered ...
By its landmark ruling on 6 March 2018 in the Achmea case, the European Court of Justice considered ...
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(1), 645-673 | Articl...
According to Opinion 1/17, the ISDS mechanism contained in CETA is in conformity with the fundamenta...
First published online: 30 November 2019This article develops the concept of the monopoly of jurisdi...
This article examines the problems connected with the participation of the EU in international dispu...
Two different dynamics govern the autonomy of the European Union (EU) legal order. On the one hand, ...
The application and implications of the principle of autonomy for international investment agreement...
With Opinion 1/17, the ECJ has declared the compatibility with EU primary law of the mechanism for t...
This article endeavours to assess whether the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (‘ISDS’) mechanism e...
International audienceLike a tightrope walker, the Court is engaging in a delicate balancing actin i...
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(1), 757-777 | Articl...
In April 2019, the Court of Justice of the EU (‘CJEU’) handed down its Opinion (C-1/17) on the compa...
Criticism of the system of Investor-State dispute settlement has led to an attempt to reform the sys...
In the Achmea case (judgment of 6 March 2018, case C-284/16), the Court of Justice applied its stand...
By its landmark ruling on 6 March 2018 in the Achmea case, the European Court of Justice considered ...
By its landmark ruling on 6 March 2018 in the Achmea case, the European Court of Justice considered ...
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(1), 645-673 | Articl...
According to Opinion 1/17, the ISDS mechanism contained in CETA is in conformity with the fundamenta...
First published online: 30 November 2019This article develops the concept of the monopoly of jurisdi...
This article examines the problems connected with the participation of the EU in international dispu...
Two different dynamics govern the autonomy of the European Union (EU) legal order. On the one hand, ...
The application and implications of the principle of autonomy for international investment agreement...
With Opinion 1/17, the ECJ has declared the compatibility with EU primary law of the mechanism for t...
This article endeavours to assess whether the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (‘ISDS’) mechanism e...
International audienceLike a tightrope walker, the Court is engaging in a delicate balancing actin i...
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(1), 757-777 | Articl...