Add to ORKGDefendant owned and operated three warehouses in the city of Chicago where merchandise received from several states was processed and/ or stored until it was ready for distribution to defendant\u27s retail stores. Such stores were located in the Chicago area, some being in Illinois and some a short distance within Indiana. Plaintiff, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, sought to enjoin defendant from violating the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, claiming that a substantial number of the employees working in defendant\u27s warehouses were engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce as that phrase is used in the act. Held, injunction denied. The Fair Labor Standards Act was not applic...
Labor made a bold attempt in the case of Apex Hosiery Company v. Leader to procure a determination b...
Representatives of defendant union approached plaintiff, proprietor of a small liquor store, with in...
For some seven or eight years before the commencement of their suit for injunction, plaintiffs had b...
Defendant owned and operated three warehouses in the city of Chicago where merchandise received from...
Defendant was a lessor of a loft building, portions of which were occupied by clothing manufacturers...
The appellant (defendant in the case below) and certain of its members were found guilty of unfair l...
The Fair Labor Standards Act was upheld by the Supreme Court as a valid exercise of the commerce pow...
Authority of Congress to regulate intrastate activities through the commerce clause is derived from ...
The owner and operator of retail food stores located throughout the nation brought action to enjoin ...
In 1966, Congress amended the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and for the first time extended the co...
The petitioning labor union made a contract with defendant employer, who was engaged solely in inter...
Respondent construction firm was engaged in building a dam, the sole purpose of which was to enlarge...
Action was brought in a federal court to enjoin the Chicago local of the A. F. of L. Mille Wagon Dri...
Extensive federal labor legislation under the commerce clause has created a perplexing jurisdictiona...
In attempting to induce certain employees of defendant, a manufacturer of bakery products, to join a...
Labor made a bold attempt in the case of Apex Hosiery Company v. Leader to procure a determination b...
Representatives of defendant union approached plaintiff, proprietor of a small liquor store, with in...
For some seven or eight years before the commencement of their suit for injunction, plaintiffs had b...
Defendant owned and operated three warehouses in the city of Chicago where merchandise received from...
Defendant was a lessor of a loft building, portions of which were occupied by clothing manufacturers...
The appellant (defendant in the case below) and certain of its members were found guilty of unfair l...
The Fair Labor Standards Act was upheld by the Supreme Court as a valid exercise of the commerce pow...
Authority of Congress to regulate intrastate activities through the commerce clause is derived from ...
The owner and operator of retail food stores located throughout the nation brought action to enjoin ...
In 1966, Congress amended the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and for the first time extended the co...
The petitioning labor union made a contract with defendant employer, who was engaged solely in inter...
Respondent construction firm was engaged in building a dam, the sole purpose of which was to enlarge...
Action was brought in a federal court to enjoin the Chicago local of the A. F. of L. Mille Wagon Dri...
Extensive federal labor legislation under the commerce clause has created a perplexing jurisdictiona...
In attempting to induce certain employees of defendant, a manufacturer of bakery products, to join a...
Labor made a bold attempt in the case of Apex Hosiery Company v. Leader to procure a determination b...
Representatives of defendant union approached plaintiff, proprietor of a small liquor store, with in...
For some seven or eight years before the commencement of their suit for injunction, plaintiffs had b...