Add to ORKGThis Article argues that juvenile court judges can safely reduce the number of children entering foster care by faithfully and rigorously applying the law. Judges often fail to perform this core functon when a state child welfare agency separates a child from their family. Judges must perform their role as impartial gatekeeper despite the temptation to be omnipotent moral busybodies
Removal and placement in foster care is child welfare’s most severe intervention, contemplated as “a...
Removing children from their parents is child welfare\u27s most drastic intervention. Research clear...
A century ago, Progressive reformers adopted a more modem construction of childhood as a development...
This Article argues that juvenile court judges can safely reduce the number of children entering fos...
This Article offers an initial evaluation of one reformed child protection system— New Orleans, Loui...
Children may unnecessarily enter foster care because their parents are unable to resolve legal issue...
This article argues that current efforts to reform the Compact are flawed because they lack an essen...
This article explores the plight of “short stayers” and argues that juvenile courts are failing to u...
Every day approximately 500,000 children across the United States wake up in foster care, most in fo...
The six sections of this Article present the case for direct federal court involvement in aiding fos...
In child welfare, the difference we can make as lawyers for parents, children, and the state, and as...
The traditional juvenile court, focused on rehabilitation and childsaving, was premised primarily ...
Over the past hundred years, a consensus has emerged recognizing a parent\u27s ability to raise his ...
Over the past decade, the child welfare system has expanded, with vast public and private resources ...
Part I of this Comment presents a brief look at the children in foster care and the maltreatment the...
Removal and placement in foster care is child welfare’s most severe intervention, contemplated as “a...
Removing children from their parents is child welfare\u27s most drastic intervention. Research clear...
A century ago, Progressive reformers adopted a more modem construction of childhood as a development...
This Article argues that juvenile court judges can safely reduce the number of children entering fos...
This Article offers an initial evaluation of one reformed child protection system— New Orleans, Loui...
Children may unnecessarily enter foster care because their parents are unable to resolve legal issue...
This article argues that current efforts to reform the Compact are flawed because they lack an essen...
This article explores the plight of “short stayers” and argues that juvenile courts are failing to u...
Every day approximately 500,000 children across the United States wake up in foster care, most in fo...
The six sections of this Article present the case for direct federal court involvement in aiding fos...
In child welfare, the difference we can make as lawyers for parents, children, and the state, and as...
The traditional juvenile court, focused on rehabilitation and childsaving, was premised primarily ...
Over the past hundred years, a consensus has emerged recognizing a parent\u27s ability to raise his ...
Over the past decade, the child welfare system has expanded, with vast public and private resources ...
Part I of this Comment presents a brief look at the children in foster care and the maltreatment the...
Removal and placement in foster care is child welfare’s most severe intervention, contemplated as “a...
Removing children from their parents is child welfare\u27s most drastic intervention. Research clear...
A century ago, Progressive reformers adopted a more modem construction of childhood as a development...